A train crash near Bedford, driver passed away many injured blamed on the signals failing....

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
So the news has extensively covered this accident and the many injured and the driver who sadly didn't make it out.
They now seem to blame it on failing signals, but how on earth on 2026?
How many accident do there need to happen before they start taking things seriously? if cars can have early automatic braking(or however it's called it can emergency brake before the driver even sees the issue/obstruction etc.) surely trains should be able to have a similar system installed?
 

Beebo

Legendary Member
Whilst it’s awful that the crash happened, we really don’t have many big train crashes in the UK. I can’t recall many big ones in the last 20 years.
And the amount of train traffic coming in and out of the large mainline stations is huge, so people are doing something right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Beebo

Legendary Member
Looking at that list, in the last 20 years there have only been 2 incidents with more than one death.
One was a derailment and one was workers on the line.
So there have been no multiple deaths as a result of signal failure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Looking at that list, in the last 20 years there have only been 2 incidents with more than one death.
One was a derailment and one was workers on the line.
So there have been no multiple deaths as a result of signal failure.

It feels a bit morbid looking at that list, but yes, it's actually quite heartening. I'm rubbish at remembering which crash (caused by faulty maintenance) resulted in the coroner making about 40 recommendations which were *all* followed, and for several years afterwards there were no passenger deaths at all.

A lot of the deaths have been caused either by operator error (some resulting in convictions for gross negligence) or by vehicles on level crossings. Very few in more recent times have been caused by equipment failure. I was reading about a Network Rail unit that runs on tracks at high speed taking photos:

"🚅 Plain Line Pattern Recognition inspection unit at Gateshead. 📷 Cameras mounted underneath the trains capture an image every 0.8mm, taking 70,000 images a second at the top speed of 125mph, to identify potential defects."
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

briantrumpet

Timewaster
It feels a bit morbid looking at that list, but yes, it's actually quite heartening. I'm rubbish at remembering which crash (caused by faulty maintenance) resulted in the coroner making about 40 recommendations which were *all* followed, and for several years afterwards there were no passenger deaths at all.

A lot of the deaths have been caused either by operator error (some resulting in convictions for gross negligence) or by vehicles on level crossings. Very few in more recent times have been caused by equipment failure. I was reading about a Network Rail unit that runs on tracks at high speed taking photos:

"🚅 Plain Line Pattern Recognition inspection unit at Gateshead. 📷 Cameras mounted underneath the trains capture an image every 0.8mm, taking 70,000 images a second at the top speed of 125mph, to identify potential defects."

The crash was Potters Bar. Loose bolts. Private contractors cutting corners. Same happened at Grayrigg later.

https://www.inquestsandinquiries.com/projects/potters-bar-inquest
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Mr Celine

Senior Member
Top Bottom