Inheritance Tax

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
You have lost me there, I wasn't aware I was suggesting that?

I was suggesting that the Financial Staus of the beneficiary was part of the consideration for how much IHT was paid.

But under your system wouldn't a large estate left to a single beneficiary be taxed at a higher rate than a similar estate left to multiple beneficiaries? So on the broad assumption that the estate is left to ones offspring, that makes it tax efficient to have more children.


I don't intend to imply that you support the two child benefits policy btw, but it is what we have right now.
 
OP
OP
icowden

icowden

Legendary Member
Personally I'd just do away with it. Income and pensions are taxed.
Instead I'd focus on the loopholes that allow tax to be avoided by taking money and assets offshore.

  • We could introduce rules that stop payouts to shareholders if companies have debts that they need to service.
  • We could be more efficient in charging windfall taxes on major corporations.
  • We could introduce the concept that taxation on companies like Amazon and Apple is based on transactions carried out with UK residents and that company profit assessment and taxation will be based on money generated by sales to the UK.
We already have stamp duty and capital gains tax on second property sales.
 

All uphill

Active Member
Personally I'd just do away with it. Income and pensions are taxed.
Instead I'd focus on the loopholes that allow tax to be avoided by taking money and assets offshore.

  • We could introduce rules that stop payouts to shareholders if companies have debts that they need to service.
  • We could be more efficient in charging windfall taxes on major corporations.
  • We could introduce the concept that taxation on companies like Amazon and Apple is based on transactions carried out with UK residents and that company profit assessment and taxation will be based on money generated by sales to the UK.
We already have stamp duty and capital gains tax on second property sales.

Sorry, that sounds to me like the "tax someone else" argument.

A bit like the Chinese should do something about climate change, rather than us.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
But under your system wouldn't a large estate left to a single beneficiary be taxed at a higher rate than a similar estate left to multiple beneficiaries? So on the broad assumption that the estate is left to ones offspring, that makes it tax efficient to have more children.


I don't intend to imply that you support the two child benefits policy btw, but it is what we have right now.

OK, I suppose it would, but, "my" scheme adheres to the principle those individuals receiving most, pay most tax. Which seems fair to me.

Do you have a better suggestion?

All academic anyway, no-one is going to listen to us. ;)
 

PK99

Regular
How can it be "irrelevant", if it is a tax on "wealth".

If (say) two people jointly inherit a £600K house, they get £300K each, if six people jointly inherit a £600K house, they get £100K each. So, the two people are more "wealthy", and, in the interests of "fairness" should be taxed more.

But they aren't. Are you proposing a shift in the method of inheritance tax?
 

PK99

Regular
Sorry to disappoint, but, as you may have observed, I live in the impoverished North, land of four bedroom detached houses for £200K. I don't think the value of our home is going to enrich the exchequer, so, no "entitlement" here.

Your entitlement is being able to pass on your house free of tax.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
But they aren't. Are you proposing a shift in the method of inheritance tax?

But they aren't what?

I was proposing that taxing the beneficiary(s) in proportion to their increase in wealth, as a result of their inheritance.

The OP, was, as I understood it, a suggestion that current IHT rules were unfair, I was therefore suggesting an amendment which I thought was more "fair".
 
Top Bottom