Brits slashing boats on French beaches

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Xipe Totec

Something nasty in the woodshed
I put resources where I hope to see the best outcomes :okay:

You must've spent half your fortune on roundabout paint by now.

How's you offering a bed in your home to the poor illegal immigrants going?

Why would I need to do that? The all get a free house, don't they?
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

tarric

Regular
Did “selling off the housing stock” reduce the number of houses then?

Yes, why would you build houses that you then had to sell for less than the cost of building them.

Councils used to build around 100,000 homes a year up till the right to buy, now they barely build enough to replace those sold or demolished. in 2023/24 the built just under 20,000 while just over 20,000 were sold or demolished that's one of the reasons we lack housing stock and lets be honest the private sector are not really interested in building low cost housing.
 

CXRAndy

Shaman
Rejoining the EU and the Dublin Agreement perhaps?

That seemed to work before that treasonous Russian grifter Farage campaigned for Brexit then whined about a problem that he created.

No it didn't, the numbers deported were pitiful when in the EU.

We also had uncontrolled migration through free movement.
 

CXRAndy

Shaman
Yes, why would you build houses that you then had to sell for less than the cost of building them.

Councils used to build around 100,000 homes a year up till the right to buy, now they barely build enough to replace those sold or demolished. in 2023/24 the built just under 20,000 while just over 20,000 were sold or demolished that's one of the reasons we lack housing stock and lets be honest the private sector are not really interested in building low cost housing.

Councils were selling old properties, cost peanuts compared to rent received and build cost
 

Ian H

Squire
Yes, why would you build houses that you then had to sell for less than the cost of building them.

Councils used to build around 100,000 homes a year up till the right to buy, now they barely build enough to replace those sold or demolished. in 2023/24 the built just under 20,000 while just over 20,000 were sold or demolished that's one of the reasons we lack housing stock and lets be honest the private sector are not really interested in building low cost housing.

The government of the time severely limited councils' ability to replace housing stock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Yes, why would you build houses that you then had to sell for less than the cost of building them.

Councils used to build around 100,000 homes a year up till the right to buy, now they barely build enough to replace those sold or demolished. in 2023/24 the built just under 20,000 while just over 20,000 were sold or demolished that's one of the reasons we lack housing stock and lets be honest the private sector are not really interested in building low cost housing.

The sale price was discounted, based on the length of time the tenant had been a Council tenant. No reason to suppose that every sale was at less than build cost, and, some houses sold would have been built many years before sale.

I believe the money from the sale of Council Houses initially went to central Government, and, that at some point, this was changed so that it went to the local authority (I could be wrong). It would seem reasonable to assume that local councils could build houses more cheaply that commercial developers (no nasty profits to be made, no greedy shareholders to appease). Recent events suggest this is not so, according to Private Eye.
 
Top Bottom