Burnham

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Political heavyweight Robert Jenrick said on GB News Burnham needs her as Home Secretary. What more reason could he need?

My Vainhopesville suggestion is that Burnham is going to get her to water down/scrap the worst stuff to piss off people like Jenrick. I'd still prefer she weren't there at all, but there would be pleasure in watching her undo a lot of the stuff she's done up till now. It's th only vaguely rational explanation I can find at the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

midlandsgrimpeur

Prostrate Member
My Vainhopesville suggestion is that Burnham is going to get her to water down/scrap the worst stuff to piss off people like Jenrick. I'd still prefer she weren't there at all, but there would be pleasure in watching her undo a lot of the stuff she's done up till now. It's th only vaguely rational explanation I can find at the moment.

I am less of the vainhopesville persuasion. Burnham's whole pitch was that Labour have got everything drastically wrong and need to change course now to have any chance at the next GE. That must have been based on the premise of winning back progessives, nearly all of whom wanted Mahmood gone and clear policy reversals. I can only now assume we are getting more of the same and an attempt to appeal to the right on immigration. I just don't see how a rowing back or even watering down works with her still in charge. Like you I live in hope, but it just seems that any real policy change needed Mahmood gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
I am less of the vainhopesville persuasion. Burnham's whole pitch was that Labour have got everything drastically wrong and need to change course now to have any chance at the next GE. That must have been based on the premise of winning back progessives, nearly all of whom wanted Mahmood gone and clear policy reversals. I can only now assume we are getting more of the same and an attempt to appeal to the right on immigration. I just don't see how a rowing back or even watering down works with her still in charge. Like you I live in hope, but it just seems that any real policy change needed Mahmood gone.

You're more likely to be right than I am, but I still struggle to explain Burnham's thinking, given how totemic she is for the Blue Labour faction and the open dislike of her from progressives.
 

C R

Legendary Member
I am less of the vainhopesville persuasion. Burnham's whole pitch was that Labour have got everything drastically wrong and need to change course now to have any chance at the next GE. That must have been based on the premise of winning back progessives, nearly all of whom wanted Mahmood gone and clear policy reversals. I can only now assume we are getting more of the same and an attempt to appeal to the right on immigration. I just don't see how a rowing back or even watering down works with her still in charge. Like you I live in hope, but it just seems that any real policy change needed Mahmood gone.

I get the same eerie feeling of wasted opportunity as I got with Starmer. :sad:
 

secretsqirrel

spiteful class warrior
You're more likely to be right than I am, but I still struggle to explain Burnham's thinking, given how totemic she is for the Blue Labour faction and the open dislike of her from progressives.

Perhaps its some sort of broad church ethos, to unite the party.

Other than that I don’t know.
 

midlandsgrimpeur

Prostrate Member
I get the same eerie feeling of wasted opportunity as I got with Starmer. :sad:

I certainly am with this decision. Like BT, I am clinging to some very slim hope that there is some yet to be revealed masterstroke to this that will alleviate our fears, but it very much feels like "if it looks like a duck, swims like......"
 
  • Sad
Reactions: C R

secretsqirrel

spiteful class warrior
I certainly am with this decision. Like BT, I am clinging to some very slim hope that there is some yet to be revealed masterstroke to this that will alleviate our fears, but it very much feels like "if it looks like a duck, swims like......"

She will have to see through her Safe Routes scheme, which might have been what swayed Burnham to keep her on.
 

midlandsgrimpeur

Prostrate Member
Perhaps its some sort of broad church ethos, to unite the party.

Other than that I don’t know.

There is a chance. He may go down the root of concilliation, keep Mahmood in place but only on the condition that her worst excesses are curbed and they present a united front. If this is the case it is a mistake though as the voters Burnham needs back want her out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
There is a chance. He may go down the root of concilliation, keep Mahmood in place but only on the condition that her worst excesses are curbed and they present a united front. If this is the case it is a mistake though as the voters Burnham needs back want her out.

Maybe the hope is that even the left could end up giving her some grudging respect by some miraculous means. Vanishingly unlikely, I know, save a Damascene conversion, and I can't think of a precedent, but hey, what do I know? Politics is a bizarre world.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
I'm perhaps even more surprised by Lisa Shall-I-Bother-To-Turn-Up-For-Work Nandy being reappointed in her previous role. Mostly she just shrugged her shoulders and appeared uninterested in her brief.
 
Top Bottom