farfromtheland
Regular AND Goofy
And to have integrity, to have that help. Labour previously tended to ditch the integrity for lowest common denominator appeal.
Do you know?
- Thread starter monkers
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
monkers
Pharaoh
Agreed. However from what I read, I don't see enough of the country getting behind him until he sorts out some of the disastrous policies left behind by Starmer. I'm thinking Gaza, the PA arrests, the lack of progress on dealing with VAWAG, and the identity politics - not an exhaustive list.
farfromtheland
Regular AND Goofy
Yes, he hasn't stepped up to the plate yet, but the curveballs are coming.
Digressing to James Burnham - quite a turnaround.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Burnham
In February 1940, Burnham wrote Science and Style: A Reply to Comrade Trotsky, in which he broke with dialectical materialism. In this text he responds to Trotsky's request to draw his attention to "those works which should supplant the system of dialectic materialism for the proletariat" by referring to Principia Mathematica by Russell and Whitehead and "the scientists, mathematicians and logicians now cooperating in the new Encyclopedia of Unified Science".[13]
Burnham's seminal work, The Managerial Revolution (1941), theorized about the future of world capitalism based upon its development in the interwar period.
Burnham agreed with Marxists that the capitalist class would inevitably lose the class struggle, but disagreed that they would lose to the working class due to this class being too disorganized and weak. He instead argued that a new class – the managerial class – would win against the capitalist class. Burnham sees this new class as the individuals engaged in "the tasks of the technical direction and coordination of the process of production".[29] The managerial class includes "operating executives, superintendents, administrative engineers, supervisory technicians; or, in government ... administrators, commissioners, bureau heads, and so on".[30]
- Which begs the question of where the Machievellianism now mainly hides?
None of the movers are immune from their past internet doodles though.
Remember Aaron Shwartz?
Epstein files anyone?
Digressing to James Burnham - quite a turnaround.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Burnham
In February 1940, Burnham wrote Science and Style: A Reply to Comrade Trotsky, in which he broke with dialectical materialism. In this text he responds to Trotsky's request to draw his attention to "those works which should supplant the system of dialectic materialism for the proletariat" by referring to Principia Mathematica by Russell and Whitehead and "the scientists, mathematicians and logicians now cooperating in the new Encyclopedia of Unified Science".[13]
Burnham's seminal work, The Managerial Revolution (1941), theorized about the future of world capitalism based upon its development in the interwar period.
Burnham agreed with Marxists that the capitalist class would inevitably lose the class struggle, but disagreed that they would lose to the working class due to this class being too disorganized and weak. He instead argued that a new class – the managerial class – would win against the capitalist class. Burnham sees this new class as the individuals engaged in "the tasks of the technical direction and coordination of the process of production".[29] The managerial class includes "operating executives, superintendents, administrative engineers, supervisory technicians; or, in government ... administrators, commissioners, bureau heads, and so on".[30]
- Which begs the question of where the Machievellianism now mainly hides?
None of the movers are immune from their past internet doodles though.
Remember Aaron Shwartz?
Epstein files anyone?
