Donald I, emperor of the world.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

AuroraSaab

Pharaoh
I gave a like to this because of the unwarranted stuff about her past sexual history, but I have no problem with bringing in his family (including her) into the slagging off over the way they are using their relationship to make billions for their and Donald’s empire since his re-election.

That's fair enough when it's relevant. It's all par for the course with US politicians of all persuasion obviously, though some exploiting of their connections/influence are worse than others. There's enough to go at with Trump's policies without the 'open season' meaning it's fine to lie about her being a prostitute.
 

Blazing Saddles

Active Member
Oh and she gets $28m from Bezos for the film directly. She's upset about the events in Minneapolis taking away the attention from the scheduled premiere,
10 years before Clinton became president, Hilary made $100k from a futures investment and when Clinton became president, this became a scandal that rolled on for weeks.

The day after Amazon’s 75 million dollar freebie documentary film flops onto cinema screens, they announce 16,000 corporate job cuts in the US and Canada.
Oligarchy is alive and well in Trumpland.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
That's fair enough when it's relevant. It's all par for the course with US politicians of all persuasion obviously, though some exploiting of their connections/influence are worse than others. There's enough to go at with Trump's policies without the 'open season' meaning it's fine to lie about her being a prostitute.
With some it is worse than others, and this family is leading the way when it comes to exploitation. And it is fine to have a go at Trump and his family members on this subject, although the other stuff about MT is not fine.
 

Pinno718

Guru
That's fair enough when it's relevant. It's all par for the course with US politicians of all persuasion obviously, though some exploiting of their connections/influence are worse than others. There's enough to go at with Trump's policies without the 'open season' meaning it's fine to lie about her being a prostitute.

I didn't call her a prostitute. I used the term 'open season' in terms of the scam that is this presidency.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
It's open season. No point being PC in the face of a whole family amassing a massive fortune through nefarious means.

Is it the magnitude of the "fortune" which is the issue, or, the means of raising it?

Is there a "size" of fortune which is acceptable?

What are the acceptable means of amassing the above acceptable size of fortune?
 
OP
OP
C R

C R

Legendary Member
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
Is it the magnitude of the "fortune" which is the issue, or, the means of raising it?

Is there a "size" of fortune which is acceptable?

What are the acceptable means of amassing the above acceptable size of fortune?

1. The means of raising it, probably leading to the size of it.

2. No, but they wouldn't be bothered to do it if it wasn't huge. They were wealthy already.

3. Earning in a way that didn't rely totally on their father's name and influence.



But I suspect you already knew all this.

Do you believe that it is perfectly fine for the members of a "First Family" to exploit their positions in this way? (This could also apply to members of our "First Family").
 
Top Bottom