I gave a like to this because of the unwarranted stuff about her past sexual history, but I have no problem with bringing in his family (including her) into the slagging off over the way they are using their relationship to make billions for their and Donald’s empire since his re-election.
Oh and she gets $28m from Bezos for the film directly. She's upset about the events in Minneapolis taking away the attention from the scheduled premiere,
10 years before Clinton became president, Hilary made $100k from a futures investment and when Clinton became president, this became a scandal that rolled on for weeks.
With some it is worse than others, and this family is leading the way when it comes to exploitation. And it is fine to have a go at Trump and his family members on this subject, although the other stuff about MT is not fine.That's fair enough when it's relevant. It's all par for the course with US politicians of all persuasion obviously, though some exploiting of their connections/influence are worse than others. There's enough to go at with Trump's policies without the 'open season' meaning it's fine to lie about her being a prostitute.
That's fair enough when it's relevant. It's all par for the course with US politicians of all persuasion obviously, though some exploiting of their connections/influence are worse than others. There's enough to go at with Trump's policies without the 'open season' meaning it's fine to lie about her being a prostitute.
It's open season. No point being PC in the face of a whole family amassing a massive fortune through nefarious means.
With some it is worse than others, and this family is leading the way when it comes to exploitation. And it is fine to have a go at Trump and his family members on this subject, although the other stuff about MT is not fine.
Is it the magnitude of the "fortune" which is the issue, or, the means of raising it?
Is there a "size" of fortune which is acceptable?
What are the acceptable means of amassing the above acceptable size of fortune?