briantrumpet
Shaman
Haha, exactly what I thought when I saw Trump's quote.
Donald I, emperor of the world.
- Thread starter C R
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
TailWindHome
Regular
Sarah Palin could see it from her house
Mad Doug Biker
Just plodding along as always.
- Location
- Over there, somewhere.
I know things have been said after this was posted, but... Really? A woman has just been shot and is dying, but instead of getting help, that would be your number one priority, important as it may have been?
Seems a bit fishy to me... In fact, the entire thing just seems a bit 'off' to me anyway.
Last edited:
Mad Doug Biker
Just plodding along as always.
- Location
- Over there, somewhere.
A travel (and presumably deportation) brochure:
Last edited:
Bazzer
Über Member
More thin blue line by the US Judiciary, this time blocking efforts to punish states which did not alter elction procedures in line with the rapist's demands.
An executive order issued earlier this year required the Election Assistance Commission to demand people show government issued proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, and directed state or local officials to record and verify the information. It also sought to require states to count ballots by Election Day. This of adversely affects Democrat States as immigrants would be those largely affected.
Several states had challenged this, so in retaliation, the tango man had directed federal election funds be withheld from those states.
Judge John H. Chun, of the U.S. District Court in Seattle, wrote in a 75-page opinion that threats aimed at states that declined to make several changes President Trump outlined violated the separation of powers and impeded states’ ability to administer their own elections. “The Constitution assigns no authority to the president over federal election administration,” he wrote.
The ruling landed as yet another blow to the White House’s attempts to impose its will on state election practices, after several other judges previously found other parts of the executive order unlawful since it was issued in March.
In his ruling, Judge Chun, a Biden appointee, took aim at the executive order’s provisions tying its objectives to federal funding. Those included conditioning federal funds on changes to state voter registration forms that would require voters signing up to offer “documentary proof” of their citizenship.
Among other things, the executive order also sought to require that states finish tallying votes on Election Day and disallow any ballots that trickle in after. It further directed the Election Assistance Commission to enact new standards, such as requiring a “paper record” of all ballots counted.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01/09/us/trump-news
An executive order issued earlier this year required the Election Assistance Commission to demand people show government issued proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, and directed state or local officials to record and verify the information. It also sought to require states to count ballots by Election Day. This of adversely affects Democrat States as immigrants would be those largely affected.
Several states had challenged this, so in retaliation, the tango man had directed federal election funds be withheld from those states.
Judge John H. Chun, of the U.S. District Court in Seattle, wrote in a 75-page opinion that threats aimed at states that declined to make several changes President Trump outlined violated the separation of powers and impeded states’ ability to administer their own elections. “The Constitution assigns no authority to the president over federal election administration,” he wrote.
The ruling landed as yet another blow to the White House’s attempts to impose its will on state election practices, after several other judges previously found other parts of the executive order unlawful since it was issued in March.
In his ruling, Judge Chun, a Biden appointee, took aim at the executive order’s provisions tying its objectives to federal funding. Those included conditioning federal funds on changes to state voter registration forms that would require voters signing up to offer “documentary proof” of their citizenship.
Among other things, the executive order also sought to require that states finish tallying votes on Election Day and disallow any ballots that trickle in after. It further directed the Election Assistance Commission to enact new standards, such as requiring a “paper record” of all ballots counted.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01/09/us/trump-news
CXRAndy
Pharaoh
In the USA you need ID for just about everything you apply for.
There is nothing wrong with ensuring voter ID I every state.
California has abolished voter ID for people living there is they have the biggest concentration of illegals. They imported the illegals after many people left the state due to ridiculously high taxes and bureaucracy.
Newsom replaced them with illegals then did away with ID voting so they could vote.
If Trump gets full state voter ID registration, california will likely turn Republican
There is nothing wrong with ensuring voter ID I every state.
California has abolished voter ID for people living there is they have the biggest concentration of illegals. They imported the illegals after many people left the state due to ridiculously high taxes and bureaucracy.
Newsom replaced them with illegals then did away with ID voting so they could vote.
If Trump gets full state voter ID registration, california will likely turn Republican
midlandsgrimpeur
Well-Known Member
A very calm and polite Renee Good speaking to ICE agents moments before she is murdered. Looks quite clear that (as we already knew) she posed no threat at all. ICE agent shouts "get out of the f*cking car" then stupidly stands in front of her as she is already clearly driving away (not at them).
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/09/ice-agent-minneapolis-bodycam-footage
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/09/ice-agent-minneapolis-bodycam-footage
Last edited:
Blazing Saddles
Active Member
Depends which way the wind is blowing between Andy’s ears.
matticus
Legendary Member
Staggering.
BTW I don't know why Ms and Ms Good were there: had they been protesting, then returned to their vehicle to drive home?
matticus
Legendary Member
fTFY.
midlandsgrimpeur
Well-Known Member
Yes, they had been protesting. It certainly looks from the footage that she was driving away from the protest. She is certainly not deliberately trying to run over ICE agents.
CXRAndy
Pharaoh
You neglected to add the pertinent point. Her partner said 'Drive baby drive' after the officer told her to get out of the vehicle.
There were two officers engaged, one who told her get out and tried to open her door and the officer in front holding his phone
She seemed to react to that command, heading straight for the officer filming. She hit him, he fired 3 rounds, first one through the windscreen.
Last edited:
