briantrumpet
Pharaoh
Since the Winter Olympics are always including more sports, I can see an opportunity here for GB - why not Ice Rugby or Ice Cricket?
Since the Winter Olympics are always including more sports, I can see an opportunity here for GB - why not Ice Rugby or Ice Cricket?
Since the Winter Olympics are always including more sports, I can see an opportunity here for GB - why not Ice Rugby or Ice Cricket?
Given the NHL is by far and away the strongest ice hockey league, and the US has more top level players than any other nation, no golds in 46 years is staggering.
Soccer is at least a global game and the No1 sport in a huge number of countries. It is far, far, far more competitive at international level than ice hockey.
Can you see the difference?
Since the Winter Olympics are always including more sports, I can see an opportunity here for GB - why not Ice Rugby or Ice Cricket?
What is the false assumption? The only remotely competitive nations in ice hockey are Canada, Sweden, the Czech Republic and the USA (and traditionally Russia). There is really only one professional league of note, the NHL, with the rest of the national or regional leagues being feeder leagues where average salaries and revenue is a faction of the NHLs.An understandable, but false assumption.
"The percentage of US-born players in the NHL is essentially flat compared to last season’s 29.2 percent, standing at 29.1 percent of the league. The percentage of Canadian players has dropped by half a percent, down to 41.1 percent of the league, which is the lowest of all time. While these figures may shift slightly due to injuries, call-ups, and other factors as the season progresses, the trends have been consistent for a while."
Since the Winter Olympics are always including more sports,
What is the false assumption? The only remotely competitive nations in ice hockey are Canada, Sweden, the Czech Republic and the USA (and traditionally Russia). There is really only one professional league of note, the NHL, with the rest of the national or regional leagues being feeder leagues where average salaries and revenue is a faction of the NHLs.
If one of the countries with the top % of players in that league haven't won the Olympics for 12 editions, that's quite a big deal.
I think the Finns might expect to be on that list -didn't they win in 2018 and 2022?
I don't think this is quite true. I was in Vancouver in 2002 when Canada finally won again. It was a big deal. Street parties, people driving around standing on the back of their pickups waving flags all day. It isn't quite what the World Cup is to footballers, but it isn't far off.
Isn't Vancouver in Canada or has Trump bought it? Or did you want me to specify 'USA'?
What is the false assumption? The only remotely competitive nations in ice hockey are Canada, Sweden, the Czech Republic and the USA (and traditionally Russia). There is really only one professional league of note, the NHL, with the rest of the national or regional leagues being feeder leagues where average salaries and revenue is a faction of the NHLs.
If one of the countries with the top % of players in that league haven't won the Olympics for 12 editions, that's quite a big deal.