Dorset Boy
Well-Known Member
So, basically it was another 110 minutes of lies and rants.
So, basically it was another 110 minutes of lies and rants.
"This is the kind of corruption that shreds a nation and we're working on it like you wouldn't believe..." and he's going to have a "...'war on fraud' lead by vice president JD Vance..".
"...and i'm going to ask you to end sanctuary cites that protect deadly criminals..."
So, basically it was another 110 minutes of lies and rants.
Not that you'd get any idea about that from the BBC report. Not one fact-check.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2d7x6zrwro
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgmlzg0p8k2o
. . . now they've had a bit of time to check . . . with predictable findings
I've been helpful in posting that and the AP fact-checker on the journalist's Bluesky post. I'm sure he'll appreciate it.
Perhaps if you paid a licence fee it might help them add staff to the fact checkers department......
Rather than constantly criticise when you avoid paying towards the BBC.....
PlumbumIt appears so, but you'll have to excuse me if I don't listen to it, as I've got other things to do, such as dipping my hands in molten lead, which are more appealing.
Plumbum
Do you pay subscriptions to everything you have the temerity to criticise? Maybe instead of chastising me, you might look at the quality of the reporting, which in this case is woefully lacking in context in the initial report.