Donald I, emperor of the world.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Pinno718

Guru
That may be true of an Investigative Journalist (if we still have such people) but, to do as your suggest, wouldn't every utterance (particularly by Politicians or PR people) reported by a Journalist have to include a "no corroborating evidence" statement?

oops, have caught up some more, I see that Rusty has more or less beat me to it 😊

They can frame comments as such "Despite no corroborating evidence, Trump said... ".
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
They can frame comments as such "Despite no corroborating evidence, Trump said... ".

I agree, but, I was not fixating on Trump, I was saying that it would be necessary to include such a qualifier for every Polictians utterances.
 

briantrumpet

Pharaoh
I agree, but, I was not fixating on Trump, I was saying that it would be necessary to include such a qualifier for every Polictians utterances.

I'd suggest that prominence of the person making a statement, their history of fibbing, and outrageousness of claims being made would influence the amount of fact-checking required. A back-bencher saying something about the bus service in their constituency is rather less consequential than the leader of a major nation fibbing, though I'd not trust a journalist who wasn't prepared to do basic checking on the stories they publish, whether it's about nuclear war or bus services.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
I'd suggest that prominence of the person making a statement, their history of fibbing, and outrageousness of claims being made would influence the amount of fact-checking required. A back-bencher saying something about the bus service in their constituency is rather less consequential than the leader of a major nation fibbing, though I'd not trust a journalist who wasn't prepared to do basic checking on the stories they publish, whether it's about nuclear war or bus services.

I have no experience of working "in the media" but, aren't stories checked by the legal team, before publication, in order to avoid legal action (unless they are Ian Hislop 😊), quite how this is dealt with for live broadcasts, I have no idea.

In the sort of example which started this discussion, isn't the journalist simply reporting what was actually said?, rather than interpreting and/or analysing the utterances?
 

briantrumpet

Pharaoh
I have no experience of working "in the media" but, aren't stories checked by the legal team, before publication, in order to avoid legal action (unless they are Ian Hislop 😊), quite how this is dealt with for live broadcasts, I have no idea.

In the sort of example which started this discussion, isn't the journalist simply reporting what was actually said?, rather than interpreting and/or analysing the utterances?

To a degree, if you cut out all the added 'ambiance', but my point is that that is not sufficient with an known liar who is repeating lies that have been previously fact-checked.

I've quoted him before, but Jonathan Swift had the measure of people like Trump 250 years before the immediacy of social media and 24-hour news:

"Besides, as the vilest Writer has his Readers, so the greatest Liar has his Believers; and it often happens, that if a Lie be believ’d only for an Hour, it has done its Work, and there is no farther occasion for it. Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it; so that when Men come to be undeceiv’d, it is too late; the Jest is over, and the Tale has had its Effect"
 

CXRAndy

Epic Member
 

Pinno718

Guru
ITV News on the SOTU speech in contrast was absolutely packed:

"At times, it was more like a game show than a speech to congress..."
"The president sought to create a divisive viral moment that would be played out on social media".
"On his most incendiary points about arrests and mass deportations, someone in the audience reminded him of the 2 people who were killed..."
"...but the whole Trump brand remains fiercely divisive..."
"It was always going to be that polarised reaction to his speech. Trumps ability to re-invent himself severely limited."
"As he left the Whitehouse tonight, only a surge in the economy can save him from a bruising defeat in the November mid term elections"

None of that anodyne shyte. Don't give me the bollox caveat 'it was in verify'.
 

briantrumpet

Pharaoh
The story's made it to the NYT...

1772061002863.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
Top Bottom