Donald I, emperor of the world.

[Pinno718]

...when they have much more important things to focus on.

You do realise they will hang you for that one?

 

[Pinno718]

Well that's the depressing state of US politics of course. But again it's expecting women to take one for the team [1]. And if they do vote Democrat just to remove Trump, some of you guys will say 'US women must agree with men in women's prisons etc or they wouldn't have voted for more of the same[2]'. Again, thanks for a sensible response that didn't involve giving yourself an aneurysm as you typed.

How bizarre. This is almost like the top item on the Green party annual conference in 2010 being... civil partnerships.
1. Trump (it's been posted before), is hardly a bastion for women's rights.
The Democrats have twice put a woman as nominee for presidential elections.

2. First of all, that's a presumption and secondly, if there is a need and if those who pose a threat, those 'men' in women's prisons are kept apart from the other inmates, then i'm fine with it.
Boot on the other foot: A person, who wants to identify themselves as a man but is physiologically a woman, is one hell of a liability on a male prison and would probably be vulnerable to all manner of abuse both physical and psychological.

So how about a common sense approach to assignation rather than your heady mix of presumption and skewed politics?

 

[briantrumpet]

If this ever gets to court (I suspect it won't), Trump is going to be the BBC's best witness.

I genuinely don't know at this point if he knows he's making stuff up... this is so specific and so disprovable, I suspect he doesn't.. his cabbage brain is just creating a narrative that makes him out to be the wronged hero.

 

[AuroraSaab]

How bizarre. This is almost like the top item on the Green party annual conference in 2010 being... civil partnerships.
1. Trump (it's been posted before), is hardly a bastion for women's rights.
The Democrats have twice put a woman as nominee for presidential elections.

No he isn't but the Democrats aren't either.
And the Tories have had 4 female leaders and 3 female prime ministers so I'm not sure what your point is.

2. First of all, that's a presumption and secondly, if there is a need and if those who pose a threat, those 'men' in women's prisons are kept apart from the other inmates, then i'm fine with it.

They aren't. The fact that you don't know that they aren't - and that in fact in the US males in women's prisons have sexually assaulted their woman cellmates shows that you aren't up to speed on these issues at all.

https://nypost.com/2026/03/26/us-ne...be-into-trans-prisoners-raping-women-finally/

Boot on the other foot: A person, who wants to identify themselves as a man but is physiologically a woman, is one hell of a liability on a male prison and would probably be vulnerable to all manner of abuse both physical and psychological.

Funnily enough the number of trans id'ed women asking to be placed in men's jails is practically zero, whereas quite a lot of the trans identifying men wish to transfer (and do in the US). Who'd be doing that abuse? Men - the kind of men who are being put in women's prisons in shared cells.

So how about a common sense approach to assignation rather than your heady mix of presumption and skewed politics?

A common sense approach would be to maintain single sex spaces for women and men but advocate for additional 3rd mixed sex spaces for those who aren't happy in their sex designated space or who don't mind sharing.

I think you will find this is totally unacceptable to trans activists. It really is 100% access to all women's spaces, all the time, and nothing less.

Anyway, I think this is better left for the gender thread if anybody wants to continue it over there. It's been a nice digression to actually talk about US party politics though not just big shoes or wallpaper.

 

[briantrumpet]

I wonder why Republicans don't like the Voting Rights Act... hmm, let me see...

 

[Pross]

Trump now exceeding the 60 days he may have been allowed to wage war for without approval. However, he has unilaterally decided that because there’s a ceasefire the clock resets and he hasn’t hit 60 days. If you take that to its natural conclusion a President could wage war without approval infinitely by having a ceasefire every 59 days. He continues to get away with ignoring the much vaunted Constitution and not only is there no sanction, there is no-one seriously pushing for one.

 

[Pblakeney]

Trump now exceeding the 60 days he may have been allowed to wage war for without approval. However, he has unilaterally decided that because there’s a ceasefire the clock resets and he hasn’t hit 60 days. If you take that to its natural conclusion a President could will wage war without approval infinitely by having a ceasefire every 59 days. He continues to get away with ignoring the much vaunted Constitution and not only is there no sanction, there is no-one seriously pushing for one.

Edited to reflect my thoughts.

 

[CXRAndy]

I wonder why Republicans don't like the Voting Rights Act... hmm, let me see...

View attachment 14829

Because it was racially discriminatory

 

[briantrumpet]

Haha, Infowars is dead, long live Infowars.

 

[Psamathe]

Yet another example of how negotiating with Trümp is a futile waste of time even when you achieve an agreement

Trump tears up EU tariff deal and raises some import duties
Donald Trump has said he is tearing up part of the tariff deal he struck with EU leaders at his golf course in Scotland last summer, criticising Brussels for taking so long to ratify the deal.

Blindsiding Brussels late on Friday, a public holiday in much of Europe, he announced that he would be increasing tariffs on cars and lorries imported into the US from the EU from 15% to 25% from next week.
...
The EU parliament’s international trade committee chair, the German MEP Bernd Lange, responded immediately, saying Trump’s announcement proved how untrustworthy the US now was.

 

[CXRAndy]

Probably due to EU not reciprocating the trade deal for US imports.

 

[CXRAndy]

It possibly offends Pino


View: https://x.com/i/status/2050306424534638943

 

[Pinno718]

Haha, Infowars is dead, long live Infowars.

"Turn your pi$$ into gold". Frkkin ace.
Love the stuttering "...the the the the the the the the the..." in the same style where they struggle to find basic words to express their pov's.
"...we can rub baby oil on each other and take turns f*cking a prime rib..."

I really hope Alex Jones watches this. It got funnier the longer it went on.

 

[briantrumpet]

"Turn your pi$$ into gold". Frkkin ace.
Love the stuttering "...the the the the the the the the the..." in the same style where they struggle to find basic words to express their pov's.
"...we can rub baby oil on each other and take turns f*cking a prime rib..."

I really hope Alex Jones watches this. It got funnier the longer it went on.

Yep, thought the pi$$-take was sublime.

 

[Blazing Saddles]

Trump’s a bit too old to go around raping pubescent girls now, so he’s turned to raping his fair country.

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/trump-us-forest-spraying-deadly-100000503.html