mudsticks
Squire
@Pale Rider has shifted his ground in this thread.
His original assertion involved a scenario where the victim calculated that by not resisting non consensual intercourse she could avoid a beating. He believes that is a non violent rape.
He's not responded to my post #318 where I suggested how he might be a victim and what his reaction might be.
The case he's now quoting involves a woman who may have been insensible at the time intercourse took place - a very different scenario.
Having sex with someone who is so inebriated that they are unable to give consent in any meaningful way , is not having consensual sex with them.
It's sexual assault.
Sexual assault, and rape are forms of violence.
I don't see why any one is still arguing against this.
Sometimes this violence has extra violence heaped on top of it.
Yuk.
In fact only one person is trying to say that rape isn't violence.
Why am I even bothering to engage with this conversation.
Why am I putting myself through it ?
There is a thread called 'Who Cares' where this topic , and some hopefully sensible and thoughtful solutions for tackling this society wide problem, could be discussed, sensitively..
I'd ask that no one joins in, if they believe that sexual assault or rape isn't violence .
We've done that one to death..
I'd have hoped.