Let’s talk about BBC

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Actually, this is a good example of why language matters. The racist bastards didn't have 'fears', they wanted to hurt foreigners.

1786074177197.jpeg
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
I think they've made a conflationary bollocks of this article, the headline at least:

Widdecombe police reopen investigation into incident at Farage's home, BBC understands

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62qrvd9303o
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
Maybe that incident has been linked to the defendant ?

Aye, that's a possibility. Doesn't stop the headline being clickbaity as f*ck, but that's the way things have gone I suppose.

"Counter terrorism police" rather than "Widdecombe police" would have been better.

The lefty Grauniad's headline is worse

Screenshot_20260808-113949.png


While righty Sun have gone with some trans nonsense...

Screenshot_20260808-114010.png
 

secretsqirrel

spiteful class warrior
BBC is a bit weird sometimes. A quote from today from - Prisoner release row proving to be Burnham's first big test as PM

Up against Sir Keir, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch managed to find issues she could use to force him on to the back foot and into what turned out to be a damaging series of policy shifts. She has seized on the early releases to do try to do the same with his successor.”

I don’t believe Badenoch forced any policy shifts. That all came from the Labour backbenches?
 

Pblakeney

Shaman
BBC is a bit weird sometimes. A quote from today from - Prisoner release row proving to be Burnham's first big test as PM

Up against Sir Keir, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch managed to find issues she could use to force him on to the back foot and into what turned out to be a damaging series of policy shifts. She has seized on the early releases to do try to do the same with his successor.”

I don’t believe Badenoch forced any policy shifts. That all came from the Labour backbenches?

An attempt to keep the Conservatives relevant.
 

Pross

Guru
BBC is a bit weird sometimes. A quote from today from - Prisoner release row proving to be Burnham's first big test as PM

Up against Sir Keir, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch managed to find issues she could use to force him on to the back foot and into what turned out to be a damaging series of policy shifts. She has seized on the early releases to do try to do the same with his successor.”

I don’t believe Badenoch forced any policy shifts. That all came from the Labour backbenches?

And the obvious answer if she uses early release as a line of attack is ‘we’ve got no choice as you didn’t build enough additional prison spaces over the 14 years you were in charge. We’ve already built more but haven’t had time to get enough yet’. It’s a very weak subject for her to try to go after.
 

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Can't help feeling that that ought to put the claim in quotation marks. As it is, it's stated as fact.

View attachment 16812


It looks like the BBC 'news' was lifted almost directly from the Telegraph, and that was basically regurgitating Jenrick's own piece in the Telegraph. Looks like there's no let-up in the BBC rooting for Reform. At least the Telegraph headline admits that benefits would be "shaken up" (aka, slashed) rather than just a mild "overhaul" (that's good, right?)

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz977nxww1jo

1786862254267.png
 

Attachments

  • 1786862189009.png
    1786862189009.png
    153 KB · Views: 0

briantrumpet

Timewaster
The headline writers or editors need to be taken to task over this.
The actual article highlights just how silly the proposals are.

Fair enough, The Telegraph can fluff whoever they want to, but as I've said before, the BBC shouldn't just be forwarding *any* party's PR pieces without at least a modicum of scepticism and comment, and headlines in particular should be suitably qualified by using words like 'claim' and the use of scare quotes.
 

Pblakeney

Shaman
Fair enough, The Telegraph can fluff whoever they want to, but as I've said before, the BBC shouldn't just be forwarding *any* party's PR pieces without at least a modicum of scepticism and comment, and headlines in particular should be suitably qualified by using words like 'claim' and the use of scare quotes.

Agreed. This is why I said they should be taken to task. It is misleading. It is BS.
 
Top Bottom