Let’s talk about BBC

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

First Aspect

Veteran
Go and have a read of the 'should i ditch my TV' thread on CC. There are loads on there who claim not to have a TV licence!
Yes I know the law on this. But if you want to watch a single live event or non delayed broadcast a year, you need a TV license. So, the world cup, the British GP, any sporting event on any channel requires a TV license. Even the TdF if you can afford to watch it now. Any big news event. Any live YouTube broadcast, Blah blah.

So it is possible but not without compromise.
 

Ianonabike

Regular
I don't have a licence. Can't say I miss live TV. I certainly don't miss contributing to some of those overinflated salaries.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
That poll was taken yesterday. So all responses will be biased to some extent by the recent news.


And any way, it shows that 50% think it is biased one way and 50% don’t know or don’t believe it is biased.

So it’s basically right in the middle.

They saw it in the media so it must be true.
 

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
An article saying that the report that provoke Trump's ire itself misrepresented Trump's speech by deliberately missing out the threatening bits.

https://www.thenewworld.co.uk/james-ball-exclusive-the-error-at-the-heart-of-trumps-bbc-attack/

Prescott’s dossier accused Panorama of “splicing” together quotes in such a way that viewers were “materially misled” – saying that due to editing portions of his speech together, it seemed like Trump had incited the Capitol riots, something that multiple investigations found Trump did, in fact, do.

His document goes on to set out what Prescott claims Trump actually said:

“Fifteen minutes into the speech, what Trump actually said: ‘We are gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you. I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.’ It was completely misleading to edit the clip in the way Panorama aired it.”

However, there is an issue with Prescott’s claims here. This is not what Donald Trump actually said in his speech. Prescott has heavily edited the remarks, changing their meaning. And just as Prescott claims there are rules for television, on making it clear when you have edited or abridged a quote, these exist in print, too. If you are abridging a quote, you signify it with an ellipsis. Prescott has not done this.

The full version of the quote that Prescott cites reads very differently. Here it is below, with the sections Prescott uses in bold.

We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them.

Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong. We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated, lawfully slated.

I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

The words “And I’ll be with you” were actually said before the first phrase in that quote, but Trump rambled and repeated himself several times. Prescott might claim that he was just tidying up the quote – but look at the material that he cut. Several of the cut sentences can be interpreted as threats.

The smoking gun quote that brought down two of the most senior editors at the BBC was itself misleadingly edited. But unlike the BBC’s edits – which at least accurately conveyed the overall impression of the march – Prescott’s edits gave a false impression of the comments.
 

icowden

Shaman
I don't have a licence. Can't say I miss live TV. I certainly don't miss contributing to some of those overinflated salaries.

I do because:-
 

Ian H

Squire
basil.JPG
 
Top Bottom