Mugshot
Über Member
How so, of the companies referred to only one has failed, the book shop. although of course they didn't fail, they closed.And there we have the classic example of why some businesses fail
Where do they fail, and how do they address that?If they don't provide customers with what customers want, then they won't survive.
It's pretty simple really and it applies in most lines of business.
Your hatred of Amazon doesn't change the fact that to survive, businesses must supply customers needs, not expect customers to adapt to the business.
We have an example up thread of someone wanting a tele delivered next day, fitted and the old one taking away, I know a number of retailers locally that will do that, even in the one horse town where I live, I'm sure our correspondent would have similar where they live. Hell, they could go and pick one up from the shop and plug the thing in themselves, today.
What the internet, or more correctly the way it's regulated, has done, because it's not a level playing field, is create a market where one lot cannot compete with the other lot in one of the areas that customers deem important, price, even though in just about every other area the high street beats the internet hands down.
You keep trotting out the adapt or die mantra. How do you adapt to something you cannot compete with? I could give you a string of examples to show why the high street cannot and will not ever be able to compete with the internet on price, unless the rules are changed, but right now, they're not fair, it's not a level playing field, and one side has a massive advantage over the other that could only be addressed with regulation.
I'm all for competition, it's necessary and important, and it's also far better for the customer, what's happening, or happened, despite your protestations, is worse for the consumer and worse for local communities.
It's not competition if one side can't compete.