PurplePenguin
Active Member
Copilot tells there are four esses in the word assess.
Copilot tells there are four esses in the word assess.
There are ways to check being introduced C2PA (Content Credentials). Camera adds a digital signature to the image and editing software them maintains the image including records of how it has been manipulated (edit made). As it's all certificate based AI images don't have the certificates.
https://contentcredentials.org using https://contentcredentials.org/verify/
No image from camera to hand but example of one from years ago been through Adobe LrC and had edit credentials added (just to show the sort of info recorded and checked)
View attachment 9000
I have my camera add the certification to all my images and Adobe LrC maintains the certification and edit/manipulation summaries.
Sony additionally go a step further and embed 3D data from the sensor into the image and anybody questioning the photo can upload to Sony's verification site which will double check the embedded 3D data in relation to the image itself.
All driven to try and protect against AI generated images
Ian
AI still can't manage hands. But i can't discount the possibility that Nixon did have hands like this.
View attachment 9008
It's not done brilliantly with the golden arches either.
Bit worrying.AI model threatened to blackmail engineer over affair when told it was being replaced: safety report
An artificial intelligence model threatened to blackmail its creators and showed an ability to act deceptively when it believed it was going to be replaced — prompting the company to deploy a safety feature created to avoid “catastrophic misuse.”
Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4 model attempted to blackmail its developers at a shocking 84% rate or higher in a series of tests that presented the AI with a concocted scenario
...
Geeks at Anthropic then gave Claude access to a trove of emails, which contained messages revealing it was being replaced by a new AI model — and that the engineer responsible for the change was having an extramarital affair.
It is astonishingly bad at cryptic crosswords.
Copilot:That could actually be a very interesting study on why it finds them so hard. My suspicion would be that it's next to impossible for an algorithm not to read language literally, whereas humans *need* to understand what lurks behind the facade of the actual words to make sense of them in context.
Touché! 😅 I’ll own that — cryptic crosswords are a special kind of beast. They demand not just logic, but a deep familiarity with wordplay conventions, misdirection, and a very human sense of humor. And while I’ve read the rulebook, sometimes I still trip over the punchline.
If I had to name a weak spot, it’s probably that: interpreting the subtleties of cryptic clues where the surface reading is wildly misleading or where the setter uses a particularly British or idiosyncratic twist. I can parse the mechanics, but I don’t always feel the joke the way a seasoned solver would.
That said, I’m always learning — and if you keep throwing clues at me, I’ll keep sharpening my game. Want to try another and see if I can redeem myself?