Assisted Dying, Yes or No?

[classic33]

I think it is inevitable that someone with learning disabilities or very low intelligence will be overtly protected from making a decision that a person of normal intelligence could make for themselves. By extension, this could apply to other people deemed "vulnerable".

I'm playing devil's advocate to an extent, because I can almost guarantee that the concept hasn't remotely occured to some of those who feel most strongly about this.

Wouldn't a person with learning disabilities or very low intelligence already have someone else making some of decisions for them on a daily basis anyway?
We already have (E)POA's and DNR's that are decided on in better times.
They aren't treated lightly, "just add this to what I want". They have a legal framework to back them up, before they can be legally binding. A set of circumstances has to be met before they can be acted upon. Will assisted dying be any different in the setup in law.

The two big things, for me, to be considered are what happens to those who might do nothing or something to aid me. And then there's suicide, often voiding any insurance and holding others to account at present. Sometimes for doing nothing to stop or trying to stop a person.

 

[Bazzer]

Given that palliative care is underfunded already, and hospices run mainly on charity, where will the money come from to fund assisted dying? If it ends up being a bought in private service what will that cost the NHS? It's possible to fund both if there's the will but assisted dying shouldn't be something that people end up feeling obliged to undertake due to health care being poor.

I am not the one who has repeatedly stated about raising or ensuring high standards of palliative care throughout the UK, it has been you.