Badenoch's (Lack Of) Vision Quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

AuroraSaab

Epic Member
But that wouldn't enable the haters to push their hate........

It's no different from what the individual that other posters called a troll did. Post any old crap without checking it because it's about somebody you don't like.
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
Point of order: he definitely was a troll. He said so himself.

This. And at least Brian actually contributes to the forum in constructive ways, although I do feel that sometimes his Bluesky enthusiasm does border on trolling.

99% of what our departed bullsh!t enthusiast posted was absolute garbage, although on the incredibly rare occasion he did actually engage made some valid points. I think I even agreed with him a couple of times!
 

Pross

Guru
No-one has said she’s done anything wrong have they? It’s just pointing out the hypocrisy in the same way some people go on about Lefties like Rayner being hypocrites for doing stuff that is completely legal (although in that case they tried so hard to make out it was illegal in the first instance).
 

briantrumpet

Timewaster
No-one has said she’s done anything wrong have they? It’s just pointing out the hypocrisy in the same way some people go on about Lefties like Rayner being hypocrites for doing stuff that is completely legal (although in that case they tried so hard to make out it was illegal in the first instance).

Thank you, Pross. That was indeed the point.

FWIW, I've also said frequently that I want a vaguely sensible Tory Party to be able to challenge Labour (and Reform, for that matter). For that, they need a vaguely sensible leader who isn't so deep in Twitter and Youtube that they do more than produce "Labour Owned!!!!" memes and who has a least an iota of self-awareness. Badenoch just isn't up to the task.
 
OP
OP
Psamathe

Psamathe

Legendary Member
No-one has said she’s done anything wrong have they? It’s just pointing out the hypocrisy in the same way some people go on about Lefties like Rayner being hypocrites for doing stuff that is completely legal (although in that case they tried so hard to make out it was illegal in the first instance).
I thought what Rayner did was not legal. She had to pay the money she previously didn't. And she broke the Ministerial Code.
 

icowden

Pharaoh
I thought what Rayner did was not legal. She had to pay the money she previously didn't. And she broke the Ministerial Code.
Greater Manchester Police confirmed that no criminal action would be taken.
HMRC found that no rules had been broken and no capital gains tax was owed.

Rayner received legal advice as to the amount of Stamp Duty that should be paid. The advice was incorrect. The result of the HMRC investigation was that she was not careless and was not guilty of deliberate wrongdoing. They did agree that she had underpaid by £40k and then gave her the opportunity to pay this, which she did.

Sir Laurie Magnus found she had broken the Ministerial Code by failing to seek additional specialist tax advice and therefore had not met the highest possible standards of proper conduct.

She accepted the findings, paid her bill and took full responsibility for the error. This caused a small hole to appear in the space-time continuum which wasn't braced to allow for a completely honest MP.

Other MPs who have notably broken the Ministerial code:
  • Dominic Raab who resigned after an independent investigation found he had been bullying civil servants. He did not accept the results of the investigation
  • Matt Hancock: Had an affair with his aide, breaking not just the code but the law
  • Priti Patel found guilty of bullying. Refused to resign. Also found guilty of holding unauthorised meetings with foreign officials for which she did resign.
  • Damian Green: Resigned after lying about porn on his office computer
  • Michael Fallon: Resigned after inappropriate behaviour towards female journalists
  • Liam Fox: Allowed a friend to have access to the MOD.
  • David Blunkett: Forgot to clear a new second job with the advisory committee.
  • Kemi Badenoch - leaked private correspondence (private information not in the public interest) with journalist Natalie White causing her to suffer online abuse.
  • James Cleverly - failed to be open with parliament regarding questions about arms sales to Israel
  • Michael Gove - used Covid emergency funds to pay for polling, attempted to supress FOI requests re NHS blood banks with HIV positiv esamples. Also gave a keynote speech on housing to an event before telling Parliament. Also broke the law by giving a contract to his mates at a PR company.
  • Jeremy "The Landlord" Hunt - has broken the code twice over issues with luxury flats by failing to report his purchases. Hunt also leaked Leveson information to NewsCorp although Cameron blocked the investigation.
  • Bobby Jenrick. Left his ministerial briefcase on the train and overruled planning inspectors to allow his mate, Dirty Des to avoid paying £40m in community levies.
  • Dishi RIshi - At least 10 breaches - attending Covid parties, lying about his wife's non-dom status, lying about his US Green card, lying about his blind management arrangements for financial investments, not mentioning his wife's shares in InfoSys and other business interests.
 
OP
OP
Psamathe

Psamathe

Legendary Member
Greater Manchester Police confirmed that no criminal action would be taken.
HMRC found that no rules had been broken and no capital gains tax was owed.

Rayner received legal advice as to the amount of Stamp Duty that should be paid. The advice was incorrect. The result of the HMRC investigation was that she was not careless and was not guilty of deliberate wrongdoing. They did agree that she had underpaid by £40k and then gave her the opportunity to pay this, which she did.

Sir Laurie Magnus found she had broken the Ministerial Code by failing to seek additional specialist tax advice and therefore had not met the highest possible standards of proper conduct.

She accepted the findings, paid her bill and took full responsibility for the error. This caused a small hole to appear in the space-time continuum which wasn't braced to allow for a completely honest MP.

Other MPs who have notably broken the Ministerial code:
  • Dominic Raab who resigned after an independent investigation found he had been bullying civil servants. He did not accept the results of the investigation
  • Matt Hancock: Had an affair with his aide, breaking not just the code but the law
  • Priti Patel found guilty of bullying. Refused to resign. Also found guilty of holding unauthorised meetings with foreign officials for which she did resign.
  • Damian Green: Resigned after lying about porn on his office computer
  • Michael Fallon: Resigned after inappropriate behaviour towards female journalists
  • Liam Fox: Allowed a friend to have access to the MOD.
  • David Blunkett: Forgot to clear a new second job with the advisory committee.
  • Kemi Badenoch - leaked private correspondence (private information not in the public interest) with journalist Natalie White causing her to suffer online abuse.
  • James Cleverly - failed to be open with parliament regarding questions about arms sales to Israel
  • Michael Gove - used Covid emergency funds to pay for polling, attempted to supress FOI requests re NHS blood banks with HIV positiv esamples. Also gave a keynote speech on housing to an event before telling Parliament. Also broke the law by giving a contract to his mates at a PR company.
  • Jeremy "The Landlord" Hunt - has broken the code twice over issues with luxury flats by failing to report his purchases. Hunt also leaked Leveson information to NewsCorp although Cameron blocked the investigation.
  • Bobby Jenrick. Left his ministerial briefcase on the train and overruled planning inspectors to allow his mate, Dirty Des to avoid paying £40m in community levies.
  • Dishi RIshi - At least 10 breaches - attending Covid parties, lying about his wife's non-dom status, lying about his US Green card, lying about his blind management arrangements for financial investments, not mentioning his wife's shares in InfoSys and other business interests.
The company she used explicitly stated "no tax or trust advice was provided".

Deciding not to take further action does not mean no laws were broken.

Other MP failings in whataboutery and in my view not relevant nor justification in Ms Rayner's case.
 

AuroraSaab

Epic Member
It's more the posting of stuff without checking it. It takes a minute to check the truth of these rage-bait things. Andy didn't bother and often neither does Brian.
 

monkers

Shaman
I think the rent is on a flat in London for when she is in Westminster. All MP's are entitled to claim such an allowance. Here's last year's figures on claims:

https://politicsuk.com/news/kemi-badenoch-tops-party-leaders-expenses-rankings/

View attachment 17168

View attachment 17169

Perhaps you should have checked yourself before saying that others are not doing so.

Badenock lives with her family in London. This is self-funded so not our business. The property in Essex is rented in her constituency 50 miles away. The rent is £2700. This is mostly met by the taxpayer. The amount is over the allowed limit, so she must top up the difference.

Personally I don't happen to favour Badenoch, but that has nothing to do with it.

Rather than breaking the rules, she is maxing out what she can get out of the system. Accordingly opinions will vary on the rights and wrong of it.
 

AuroraSaab

Epic Member
So some MPs get funding for a property in the capital, others for a property in their constituency. Same thing really. And as the graphic shows she's nowhere near the highest claimer. Many of them, from all parties, are indeed maxing the system.
 

monkers

Shaman
So some MPs get funding for a property in the capital, others for a property in their constituency. Same thing really. And as the graphic shows she's nowhere near the highest claimer. Many of them, from all parties, are indeed maxing the system.

You have to expect some to claim more than others. If the MP's constituency is Orkney and Shetland they might be the both biggest spender, also the thriftiest.
 
Last edited:
It's more the posting of stuff without checking it. It takes a minute to check the truth of these rage-bait things. Andy didn't bother and often neither does Brian.
There are differences though. MAGAndy was being intentionally inflammatory and often racist, to get a rise out of people. Their truth or otherwise was of no significance. He also did not discuss anything on this discussion board, simply choosing to post something else.

Brian posts things that mostly pass the blush test, and are intended to spark discussion, some of which turn out to be not true. That's more a sign of the tines than anything else. It is getting harder to tell.
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
There are differences though. MAGAndy was being intentionally inflammatory and often racist, to get a rise out of people. Their truth or otherwise was of no significance. He also did not discuss anything on this discussion board, simply choosing to post something else.

Brian posts things that mostly pass the blush test, and are intended to spark discussion, some of which turn out to be not true. That's more a sign of the tines than anything else. It is getting harder to tell.

Fork me, that's bang on.
 
Top Bottom