BRFR Cake Stop 'breaking news' miscellany

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Pinno718

Legendary Member
But there are undoubtably benefits of some uses of AI. We need to restricted the frivolous use to generate images, write your Uni dissertation for you etc. and concentrate the resource where it is beneficial e.g. assisting in medicl diagnosis and treatment.

That 'frivolous' use is simply a side effect of a much more insidious purpose: Musk et all, use media to spread their message, to control the narrative. The frivolous use is convenient distraction form the real agenda which is control; to track your actions and spending habits.
A commentator said that it is becoming increasingly more difficult to start a small business in the face of Mega Corps like Amazon, Star Bucks, Costa and retail outlets are reserved only for those who can afford big online purchase and ordering facility or the resources to pay the rates.
To add to that, big corps register HQ's in foreign lands with beneficial banking and tax rates whereas local businesses pay full whack and get little or no tax breaks. AI for me is mainly about monopolising markets, industry and profit and worse... government because Democratic process may curb profit and hegemony. We can go back to DOGE where Musk awarded himself govt. contracts, extracted millions of records of personal data whilst stripping agencies of accountability under a veil of cutting bureaucracy and waste. It's dystopian and it's not the figment of the imagination anymore.

Peter Thiel does not believe in Democracy for example. He believes in technocracy. He preaches the merits of Technocracy up and down the US in well frequented venues. Autistic tech nerds lack empathy; they do not see the benefits of society and they exist out with it in a bubble.
 

Ian H

Shaman
In science there is the argument that seemingly frivolous experiments have led to useful, important results. Might the same be true within the weird world of AI?
 

Pinno718

Legendary Member
In science there is the argument that seemingly frivolous experiments have led to useful, important results. Might the same be true within the weird world of AI?

I don't think anyone is arguing that.
The main motive for developing AI is commercial.

It's a bit like Freidman economics - if you make big profits, there will be a trickle down effect.
(Which has since been disproved).
If we develop AI, then there will be a trickle down effect...
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
I'm going to have to ponder this thought.

1782209979051.png
 
  • Sad
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Musk loses about $150bn, but is still (on paper) the richest person on the planet with ~$1tn. It's just obscene, and is, IMHO, a good argument against capitalism as a force for good, especially if it allows this kind of hoarding with no-one able to challenge it.

But yeah, trickle-down economics, mustn't upset the billionaires.

1782214367256.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Pblakeney

Squire
Musk loses about $150bn, but is still (on paper) the richest person on the planet with ~$1tn. It's just obscene, and is, IMHO, a good argument against capitalism as a force for good, especially if it allows this kind of hoarding with no-one able to challenge it.

But yeah, trickle-down economics, mustn't upset the billionaires.

View attachment 15921

Yeah. There is meme about those hoarding that much money while there are starving children.
(C)see you next Tuesday.
 

C R

Legendary Member
Musk loses about $150bn, but is still (on paper) the richest person on the planet with ~$1tn. It's just obscene, and is, IMHO, a good argument against capitalism as a force for good, especially if it allows this kind of hoarding with no-one able to challenge it.

But yeah, trickle-down economics, mustn't upset the billionaires.

View attachment 15921

I really have no sympathy for any investors losing money on this. Anyone paying attention would know that space x is vapourware.
 
Top Bottom