briantrumpet
Über Member
A rash, and, untrue assumption 😂
The Daily Mail has a renewable resource of fact-free reporting.
A rash, and, untrue assumption 😂
Have you not heard of renewable resources? They've been discussed extensively on this thread.
(and probably in The Daily Mail?)
Taken to it's logical conclusion, ultimately the entire planet is finite.
A rash, and, untrue assumption 😂
The Daily Mail has a renewable resource of fact-free reporting.
BP are not really big players in the renewable energy market, so I'm not sure that focusing on oil will make much difference.
BP are not really big players in the renewable energy market, so I'm not sure that focusing on oil will make much difference.
er ... you did realise that was just an illustration of "Renewable Resources" (and that even the Daily Mail reports on them). Do you do context?
And isn't a lot of this sort of thing reporting overall numbers for multinationals which are responding to US policy?
Apologies, I thought you had engaged sensible discussion mode without all the insults. As we were then.
Apart from arguing everyone round in a circle, how does this comment contribute to the debate? Just asking!
Let's see ... Search shows 8 pages of my posts, back to 2021 on this thread. I guarantee there's something there you will like. xxx
I spoil you, Mr Lad, I really do ...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14438325/BP-plans-slash-spending-green-energy.html
BP abandons green energy drive by slashing renewables budget and ploughing extra £8bn into oil and gas
The oil firm's move is a huge blow to energy secretary Ed Miliband's green agenda as BP joins a growing list of businesses rowing back their previous plans to focus on renewable energy and lowering emissions.
My point was, I do not read the Daily Mail, not, the Daily Mail’s coverage of the subject