Yesterday, I saw a chart of popularity of Tory front bench politicians among Tory Party members, and to my surprise Braverman was right up there near the top with only one person ahead of her. Which means that in a leadership contest put to Tory party members she would be in a very strong position.
It's clear she is positioning herself for this, and all the chatter is that she is goading Sunak to sack her.
But I'm wondering. Maybe she is hoping that her dogwhistles have worked, coupled with hard-right groups like Turning Point putting the call out for people to attack the Armistice Day Palestine march, and there will be some violence.
At which point she can resign in disgust at Sunak failing to force the Met to ban the march.
Or she might hope that the riots she's trying to incite will give her grounds to agitate for martial law to be introduced.
(This is nothing to do with multitool's main point, but: ) there's some subtlety to banning marches....she can resign in disgust at Sunak failing to force the Met to ban the march.
(This is nothing to do with multitool's main point, but: ) there's some subtlety to banning marches.
I *believe* only the Home Sec can ban a march; and he/she can ONLY do this if the police (Met Commisioner specifically?) gives them hard intell that there is high risk of violence/unrest/damage/yada-yada. (So Sunak has no direct control of this.)
HENCE the Police Chief asked protestors to be nice this weekend, but has not given the Home Sec the ammunition to actually ban a march. (i.e. he is quite happy for any/all marches to go ahead!)
I'm just hoping that ms Bravermans 'pronouncements' tip any march attending 'waverers' over the line into
"Well sod her, I'm definitely going now" action.
Indeed!!!
(But I also hope they do all play nicely, sticking to the proposed route/timings to avoid the cenotaph ceremony.)
Rumours of a reshuffle at no 10 going on.
Rumours of a reshuffle at no 10 going on.