Donald I, emperor of the world.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Remarkably, the US press pool has said it won't cover Trump's pressers because of his illegal exclusion of specific news organisations he doesn't like. Given that Fox is currently the pool's lead organisation and made the announcement, it is really going to wind Trump up when his lunatic ramblings just drift away on the wind, as they did here.

https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mw2bntc2aq23
 

Blazing Saddles

Well-Known Member
Remarkably, the US press pool has said it won't cover Trump's pressers because of his illegal exclusion of specific news organisations he doesn't like. Given that Fox is currently the pool's lead organisation and made the announcement, it is really going to wind Trump up when his lunatic ramblings just drift away on the wind, as they did here.

https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mw2bntc2aq23

It’s the second time that Fox News have shown solidarity with its colleagues after a Trump journo banning.

As far as the press are concerned, the first amendment trumps Trump every time.
 

briantrumpet

Timewaster
I can hardly wait... "There appears to be no new material as of yet" 🤣

1790065561147.png
 

icowden

Epic Member
It's going well...

https://newrepublic.com/post/215671/donald-trump-media-ban-backfires-microphones

Donald Trump’s attempts to silence the media have only turned out to silence him.
The president participated in a ribbon cutting ceremony for his new helipad on the South Lawn of the White House Monday, speaking in front of a hard-hatted crowd wearing neon yellow, high-visibility vests. But exactly what Trump was saying remained a mystery, as the press pool wasn’t present to mic him up.

Instead, the White House’s official feed was unable to pick up any noise apart from the blaring drone of a stationary Marine One helicopter parked yards away. Trump’s audio was completely garbled.

Even Newsmax—one of the few networks to air the event—recognized that it was “one example” of the president’s censorship scheme “backfiring just a little bit.”

“Obviously the ramifications are right here. Can’t hear what the president’s saying,” remarked Newsmax host Bianca de la Garza.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
It gives me some small hope that the tide is slowly turning against Trump in the US in the fact that Fox News has joined the boycott.
 

Beebo

Squire
It gives me some small hope that the tide is slowly turning against Trump in the US in the fact that Fox News has joined the boycott.

I’m sure they all hate him. They are just scared of him.
The vitriol will start flying once he’s a lame duck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Dorset Boy

Über Member
His speech to the UN this afternoon was stacked full of his usual untruths and blatant lies. It was also largely me, me me, i'm so great.
Sadly he got the odd round of applause from whoever was in the hall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Psamathe

Squire
His speech to the UN this afternoon was stacked full of his usual untruths and blatant lies. It was also largely me, me me, i'm so great.
Sadly he got the odd round of applause from whoever was in the hall.
Whilst reporters go on about how he's talking to or addressing the US electorate how many swing/potential Trûmp/Republican voters are watching UN speeches? Probably not many. Those he needs to get on his side were sitting in front of him and 99% would have recognised the lies, ego, twaddle, etc. and been looking to go with their Plan B (get closer to anybody except the US).
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Pinno718

Slight downhill specialist
Remember the Graham Platner allegations?...

Both the NYT and Politico left critical information about the alleged assault that lead to Platner stepping down from the race.
Of course, everybody jumped on the bandwagon and had him guilty as charged from the moment the story broke. However, no charges were brought against him and it appears that Platner was removed because he wasn't a suitable candidate; that being, part of the corporate PAC or AIPAC.
So the 600 Democratic members who decide on candidates will not back an 'outsider'.

The only paper to contradict the story was The Hill. After all, both the NYT and Politico are PAX~AIPAC backed.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5911722-platner-ex-girlfriend-new-york-times/

If this is true, then post Trump America won't quite be the Democratic state that we would hope for.
The Democratic party is intrinsically linked to both PAC and AIPAC lobbyists.

https://www.bangordailynews.com/202...crats-want-convention-replace-graham-platner/

There is hope. Time Magazine

'We're Proving It Works': Inside the DSA’s Push to Remake the Democratic Party​


https://time.com/article/2026/08/20/inside-dsa-reshape-democratic-party/
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
Top Bottom