Donald I, emperor of the world.

[Pinno718]

0.016
Would
0.02
be
0.03
even
0.036
easier too
0.039
if it
0.043
wasn't written
0.027
like
0.0059
this

I'm not editing all those time stamps out just for the lazy luddites after copy/pasting.
Did you watch the video/read the transcript?

 

[CXRAndy]

49ers second draft linebacker pick


View: https://x.com/0HOUR1__/status/1970195603062718646?t=L-28kTVFwV6IU4JmEf4GEw&s=19

 

[briantrumpet]

I'm not editing all those time stamps out just for the lazy luddites after copy/pasting.
Did you watch the video/read the transcript?

To be fair, Crockett is one of the ones who is worth watching, but a good transcript would be quicker and would show the clarity of her argument (I read the time-stamped transcript). Of the commentators, Supertanskii is one of the few I will actually watch, as her delivery (and use of video to expand on what she's saying) is so brilliantly disdainful and doesn't just r e a d o u t t w e e t s r e a l l y s l o w l y to fill out video time.

 

[Pinno718]

To be fair, Crockett is one of the ones who is worth watching, but a good transcript would be quicker and would show the clarity of her argument (I read the time-stamped transcript). Of the commentators, Supertanskii is one of the few I will actually watch, as her delivery (and use of video to expand on what she's saying) is so brilliantly disdainful and doesn't just r e a d o u t t w e e t s r e a l l y s l o w l y to fill out video time.

I cannot change the transcript.

 

[icowden]

I cannot change the transcript.

You can - you can toggle timestamps. Copy and paste the text into Notepad++ (or word) and replace CRLF with Space:-

A lot to cover. So, I'm starting with the AG. I want you to tell me whether or not it's lawful or lawless. Ignoring court orders. That's lawless. Impounding congressional funds violates the law. Invoking emergency powers when there is no emergency. Unlawful. Sending troops without an invite. Violates the law. Covering for pedophiles. I just threw that one in there.

Okay, I'll move to the next one. What about revoking birthright citizenship? Violates the 14th amendment of the constitution. How about violating due process? Violates the fifth and 14th amendment of the constitution. How about um what we see happening with redistricting that would in some way minimize if not delete the voices of people of color as they are going through and illegally um going through this process. Is there a constitutional amendment that you can think of that is associated with that? Um, probably many, but it is unlawful and unconstitutional and unamerican. Thank you. As well as um, can you tell me if it is lawful or lawless to violate free speech? That's lawless. Okay, sounds about right cuz you know, we had to have a conversation about Jimmy Kimmel. So, I'm going to say free Jimmy Kimmel um, for sure. And hopefully we will deal with the FCC uh, chairman. But the reason that I wanted to go through that long list, and that was actually not even the half of it, is because since this administration has come in on January 20th, they have engaged in some form of every single thing that I said on that list, even the part about covering for pedophiles.

So my question is, why are we sitting here today? Number one, they already passed their bootleg laws. And it's clear that even the bill author is not well informed about what his bill does because as has already been stated, at the at the age of 18, you are an adult. So this idea that somehow 21 year olds were now somehow juveniles under DC law, is that accurate or inaccurate? It was inac inaccurate. Misunderstood the way the law works. Correct. could not understand how to read the law and decided that they were going to rewrite the law and mess up the law. And to be clear, we were talking about judges being able to have enough discretion to decide whether or not they were going to give someone an opportunity maybe to clean their record, such as the bill author was given that opportunity under Florida law because his second felony was picked up when he was 21 to be clear. So, he was older than 18. And under this law, if you were under what? 25. So 24 or under, then the judges had discretion. Correct. But only in certain kinds of cases, not the most serious cases. And in fact, that discretion was, as we know, exercised very rarely. And it would have been an opportunity had the Congress wanted to talk with the folks who are involved in applying that law and seeing how it works to understand that this is not a law that's out of sync with other states and it's working. Thank you so much. And the reason that it matters is because now the gentleman from Florida is trying to become a governor. And chances are maybe DC once they get statethood could have had a future governor that had a second chance. But since they don't want other people to have chances that they've been given, they want to just pretend like they are bigger and better and better than.

So I will move on because I am frustrated that we are having this hearing when we know that this administration can't take care of their own business. Uh, as we know, they recently illegally bombed yet another Venezuelan boat and we may be headed for a war. We know that uh this particular president has decided that he wants to shake down people um as relates to the First Amendment because he has filed not one lawsuit, not two lawsuits, but he has filed numerous lawsuits. He filed a lawsuit against the New York Times. He filed one against the Wall Street Journal, against CBS, against ABC, against the De Mo Register. He is doing all of this because he wants to quash any speech that is not appreciative or allowing him, which is pretty much anything that's factual.

So, let's talk a few facts about these January 6 felons that should still be incarcerated because they went through the process. But because they were doing things on his behalf, of course, he wanted to let them go. So they released more than a thousand people who participated in the insurrection on this government, many of whom who had previous criminal records, like Mr. Theodore Mindenorf, who was convicted of predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, or Mr. Peter Schwarz, who had 38 prior convictions, including one where he beat his wife by repeatedly punching and biting her. Trump also pardoned Mr. David Daniel, who was convicted of production and possession of child pornography. Trump also pardoned Mr. Daniel Ball, who quote threw an explosive device that detonated upon at least 25 officers during the capital riot. He also had a record for quote domestic violence by strangulation. I'm not done. Trump also pardoned Mr. Andrew Taki, who sent nudes to an undercover law enforcement officer who was posing as a 15-year-old girl. Mr. Casey Hopkins also received a pardon from Trump. And Mr. Hopkins was convicted of forcible rape. According to court records, he quote have forcible intercourse with the victim, choked her to the point of impairing her vision, banged her head into a wall, and urinated into the victim's mouth as he humiliated her. These are the people that he decided to release in the streets of DC. So, if anybody does need to clean up DC, I would agree it is this man because he is the one that is causing half the crime that we have. Not only is he participating in the crime, but we know that he instigated the insurrection. And if I did say that I had one issue with the Biden Harris administration, it is the fact that they did not move forward and make sure that this man was put where he should have been put because the last time I checked as a criminal defense attorney and Mr. Attorney General, you may have a different experience. But I never had a defendant that had 34 convictions for felonies and did not spend one day in jail. Never in my life. And the last time I checked, the party of law and order is the only one that decided that they would be out of order and decided to nominate someone who was not only indicted, but was actually convicted of multiple felonies. That has never happened in this country. And it is a shame that we are dealing with it now. And now he wants to tell y'all how to do your jobs. Okay.

 

[Pinno718]

You can - you can toggle timestamps. Copy and paste the text into Notepad++ (or word) and replace CRLF with Space:-

I simply copy/pasted the transcript from YT and that's that.
I'm not playing sekertary. I'll pass it on to you and you can do it.

 

[Psamathe]

Kimmel back, widespread condemnation here of Farage's proposed end to ILR. Perhaps we are starting to get somewhere.

Makes one wonder if all the publicity will result in higher ratings numbers? Off-air for just one week(?) but loads of coverage throughout the US and world press.

 

[Psamathe]

And now ... new medical advice from the unqualified often incoherent disinterested party who proposed injecting people with disinfectant to cure Covid. Whilst all scientific studies and medical advice recommend not following the new advice (just as the same expert sources recommended not injecting disinfectant to cure Covid).

 

[midlandsgrimpeur]

Makes one wonder if all the publicity will result in higher ratings numbers? Off-air for just one week(?) but loads of coverage throughout the US and world press.

I am sure he will get an initial ratings bump! Have seen various comments around whether Disney will have agreed to reinstate him but only if he tones down the political rhetoric. I would be surprised if Kimmel would agree to any kind of internal censorship (not that what he said originally warranted any).

 

[briantrumpet]

And now ... new medical advice from the unqualified often incoherent disinterested party who proposed injecting people with disinfectant to cure Covid. Whilst all scientific studies and medical advice recommend not following the new advice (just as the same expert sources recommended not injecting disinfectant to cure Covid).

At least Streeting has got this one right, unlike some of the media, who weaselily call it a 'contentious' claim, or the link 'unproven', rather than 'false' or 'debunked'.

 

[PurplePenguin]

At least Streeting has got this one right, unlike some of the media, who weaselily call it a 'contentious' claim, or the link 'unproven', rather than 'false' or 'debunked'.

View attachment 10114

The words "about medicine" are superfluous.

 

[Pinno718]

Trump makes up sh*t as he bumbles along and is single handedly curing autism:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinEMgW-0Uc

 

[briantrumpet]

Trump makes up sh*t as he bumbles along and is single handedly curing autism:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinEMgW-0Uc

He's a bit like AI, utterly unable to admit he doesn't know something.

 

[Psamathe]

Trump makes up sh*t as he bumbles along and is single handedly curing autism:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinEMgW-0Uc

I didn't watch the youtube linked video (it's an hour) but saw the excerpt on TV last night and Trump is struggling even reading the script. And he throws in a few daft "ad-lib" comments that make things even less coherent.

Ignoring the daft message and impacts of that message, he is truely diabolical at public speaking even when he has a script to read.

 

[briantrumpet]

He's a bit like AI, utterly unable to admit he doesn't know something.

Ha, I just thought how delicious it would be if Chris Morris somehow got to interview him - remember the episode of Brass Eye, where he interviewed MPs about a fictional drug, and rather than admit they'd never heard of it, they expressed disgust at it when they were on camera.