I've never put It on ignore, I just scroll past that big stupid flag.
But @cookiemonster and @xipetotec are on ignore because they keep responding to It.
Hang on, I'm confused. Don't guns save lives, when it's the good guys that have them?
View attachment 12551
Don't go armed with a gun against federal agents
Hang on, I'm confused. Don't guns save lives, when it's the good guys that have them?
View attachment 12551
The right to bear arms is *only* for school shootings
The right to bear arms is *only* for school shootings
Hang on, I'm confused. Don't guns save lives, when it's the good guys that have them?
View attachment 12551
The agents are trained to make self defence actions whatever level is *needed* to protect themselves or any other person in danger
They had already removed the legally held gun
Ken White of Popehat has been mentioned here before. He is a former federal prosecutor and famous free speech (not freeze peach) advocate. In this piece he looks at the moral cases for and against political violence given the circumstances in the US. The comments are worth a read too.
https://www.popehat.com/p/we-should-talk-about-the-morality-of-political-violence
The right to bear arms is *only* for school shootings