Donald I, emperor of the world.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
C R

C R

Guru
i see S666 has activated his alter ego again.

Someone using a sock puppet in an Internet forum? Shirley, that's inconceivable
1751712047558.gif
 

CXRAndy

Legendary Member
Without a doubt. You are proof.

I didn't vote for Trump :laugh:
 

Pinno718

Well-Known Member
It's just a good job that left leaning middle class types with good jobs on cycling forums aren't ever manipulated into voting a certain way. Obviously that would never happen.

I am pretty centrist but that's by the by. Though, in the states, I would would be classed as a woolly Marxist, leftist liberal such is their lack of political understanding.
So you are not making the discernible difference between UK voters and US voters?
It is starkly evident that MAGA's are self serving and everything they do is egotistical and justified by a) god and b) their supremacy (upheld by that religious belief). I do not see that parallel en masse in the UK or Europe. Not enough to sway the vote. In the US, if the bible bashers as a collective, do not align themselves (bar Obama) with a Presidential candidate, that person will not become president.
That has huge domestic and global implications. The implication also, is that over the past 249 years, religion has shaped American politics. You tell me what the similarities with the UK are.
You are also making the assumption that if I read say, a Guardian article, I am unaware of the bias. So therefore, I am being manipulated. I will listen to Times Radio who are unilaterally anti-Trump yet, the Times Radio is ostensibly a Tory bugle.
 

Shortfall

New Member
I am pretty centrist but that's by the by. Though, in the states, I would would be classed as a woolly Marxist, leftist liberal such is their lack of political understanding.
So you are not making the discernible difference between UK voters and US voters?
It is starkly evident that MAGA's are self serving and everything they do is egotistical and justified by a) god and b) their supremacy (upheld by that religious belief). I do not see that parallel en masse in the UK or Europe. Not enough to sway the vote. In the US, if the bible bashers as a collective, do not align themselves (bar Obama) with a Presidential candidate, that person will not become president.
That has huge domestic and global implications. The implication also, is that over the past 249 years, religion has shaped American politics. You tell me what the similarities with the UK are.
You are also making the assumption that if I read say, a Guardian article, I am unaware of the bias. So therefore, I am being manipulated. I will listen to Times Radio who are unilaterally anti-Trump yet, the Times Radio is ostensibly a Tory bugle.

Yeah, everyone thinks they're a centrist. If you think there's a problem with the leaders being elected under the current system in America (or the UK come to that) then what solutions do you propose?
 

Ian H

Squire
Yeah, everyone thinks they're a centrist. If you think there's a problem with the leaders being elected under the current system in America (or the UK come to that) then what solutions do you propose?
Very different systems in the two countries. US presidents are not elected by popular vote.
The UK could do with a well-thought out proportional voting system. Both countries would benefit from serious restrictions on fund-raising and spending.
And no, I'm not centrist.
 

Pinno718

Well-Known Member
Yeah, everyone thinks they're a centrist. If you think there's a problem with the leaders being elected under the current system in America (or the UK come to that) then what solutions do you propose?

Are you sealioning by any chance?
FTR: As what Ian H said, regarding funding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Shortfall

New Member
Are you sealioning by any chance?
FTR: As what Ian H said, regarding funding.

No, I posted a few short responses to people suggesting that Reform voters were thick. Rather than entering into tit for tat and point scoring (apart from Orraloon who deserves it) I thought I'd try to illicit some constructive replies. If you think my asking one simple question is relentlessly pursuing you for evidence then I can't help you. FWIW I agree that political fund raising needs a coat of looking at, not convinced on PR however.
 

Pblakeney

Well-Known Member
PR is a disaster as it becomes a talking shop coalition that gets nothing done.
Last years have shown that massive majorities are a disaster as the wrong things get done. In the UK the parties divide and conquer themselves.
On balance I prefer PR. Status quo is preferable to mismanaged leadership making everything worse.

But the leading party is not going to be that turkey voting for Christmas.
 

Shortfall

New Member
Less-well-educated isn't a suggestion, it's shown by the recorded results of various surveys.

Perhaps. The challenge for the established parties is to win them over with policies that meet some of their needs. Talking down to them and dismissing them as xenophobic thickos didn't help win the EU referendum did it?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom