Donald I, emperor of the world.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Read the fact checking and see if you still feel justified in some of the things you've said about him or whether you've just swallowed whole what your tribe has told you what to think.

It's easier to repeat something you've read on the internet than look at the source material.

G0nthzBWoAA7LJG.jpeg


Stephen King has 6 million X followers and, without even fact checking, posted that Kirk wanted gay people stoned to death.

G0qMlSjWEAAhQ6D.jpeg


There's something about social media that turns people into idiots.
 

CXRAndy

Squire
Stephen King has 6 million X followers and, without even fact checking, posted that Kirk wanted gay people stoned to death

And Cookie regurgitated that same accusation. Gloated at Charlie Kirks death.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
There's something about social media that turns people into idiots.

Agreed. And there’s something about idiots that makes them search out and see social media as any true guide to the truth…not mentioning any names.

For example, returning to Charlie Kirk, do not look at biased social media extracts of his debates with passionate but over-excitable young students, but look at say a full debate like the recent one at the Cambridge Union…especially the last debate where he was taken to pieces by a calm, older person based on facts not rhetoric.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
C R

C R

Guru
Agreed. And there’s something about idiots that makes them search out and see social media as any true guide to the truth…not mentioning any names.

For example, returning to Charlie Kirk, do not look at biased social media extracts of his debates with passionate but over-excitable young students, but look at say a full debate like the recent one at the Cambridge Union…especially the last debate where he was taken to pieces by a calm, older person based on facts not rhetoric.

You and your facts.
 

matticus

Guru
It's easier to repeat something you've read on the internet than look at the source material.

View attachment 9969

Stephen King has 6 million X followers and, without even fact checking, posted that Kirk wanted gay people stoned to death.

View attachment 9970

There's something about social media that turns people into idiots.

Not sure this is related to the Trump campaign to allow gay sex: can anyone find evidence of this admirable campaign more recent than Feb 2019? (when he was clearly just using it to bash Iran over the head)
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

CXRAndy

Squire
Agreed. And there’s something about idiots that makes them search out and see social media as any true guide to the truth…not mentioning any names.

For example, returning to Charlie Kirk, do not look at biased social media extracts of his debates with passionate but over-excitable young students, but look at say a full debate like the recent one at the Cambridge Union…especially the last debate where he was taken to pieces by a calm, older person based on facts not rhetoric.

Are you talking about the black lad talking about South Africa?

Charlie Kirk said almost immediately, he knew very little of detail on the subject.
 
More free speech, from WaPo. Doing Trump's bidding at every turn now, it seems. A black woman? How dare she.

https://karenattiah.substack.com/p/the-washington-post-fired-me-but

View attachment 9973

One thing that has taken me aback over the last few years is just how utterly spineless a large number of major media outlets have become. Not only that, many are now implicated in doing the bidding of their bosses and their political associates. I find the number of journalists both here and the US who are willing to go along with it equally as depressing.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
Are you talking about the black lad talking about South Africa?

Charlie Kirk said almost immediately, he knew very little of detail on the subject.

I was talking about the last debate with someone who based it on facts not rhetoric. He was white, not that that is relevant, and he was certainly past being a lad which is more relevant.
 

CXRAndy

Squire
I was talking about the last debate with someone who based it on facts not rhetoric. He was white, not that that is relevant, and he was certainly past being a lad which is more relevant.

Why dont you link to the point you're trying to make. We can all then watch :okay:
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
Why dont you link to the point you're trying to make. We can all then watch :okay:

I did say the last individual debate in the full debate. About 5/10 mins before the end. You can ff to the end or preferably watch the full debate. Neither is difficult to do.

Search for: Charlie Kirk + Q&A / Debate | Cambridge Union

This is interesting comment on his debates with US college students.:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/centrist/comments/1l0iin0/why_did_charlie_kirk_seem_to_not_do_well_when/
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom