Donald I, emperor of the world.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Rusty Nails

Country Member
When you a have a person who thinks so many successful people are peanuts, are most likely a loser in life.

Its OK, somebody has to be a loser :okay:

Your logic and arithmetic are as bad as your judgement.

Criticising the three billionaires named out of the 1000+ in the US and UK is not “so many”.

Stick to posting clips from X.
 

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
There does seem to be a pattern here.

1758793088352.png
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
Polarised on what basis?

Simply pointing out that the reason they get stick is because they are very rich (and clearly well known). There are plenty of peanuts who are well known but not extremely wealth who don't attract the ire of our resident socialists and lefties. Go figure.

Polarised because you lack the ability (or desire) to see anything in other than terms of lefties/socialists and rightshites.

Out of interest how do you define a Socialist? I have not seen anyone on this forum who advocates Socialism as a political end, just plenty who are to the left of you. Perhaps that is all the definition you need.
 

Psamathe

Guru
There does seem to be a pattern here.

View attachment 10155
And they are getting richer as vast numbers get poorer.

And those platforms are widely recognised as doing significant damage to society. If a chemical factory was spewing out waste causing health impacts to the population it would quickly be shut down yet these megawealthy continue to make their profits off the back of damage to society and we at best make feeble token gesture to perhaps consider about maybe slightly reducing that damage ... but only if the megawealthy agree.
 

Stevo 666

Veteran
Polarised because you lack the ability (or desire) to see anything in other than terms of lefties/socialists and rightshites.

Out of interest how do you define a Socialist? I have not seen anyone on this forum who advocates Socialism as a political end, just plenty who are to the left of you. Perhaps that is all the definition you need.

Nope, I just choose to argue a particular point. Fully aware of the intricacies of these things, but when faced with simplistic leftiebollox arguments, sometimes it's better to fight fore with fire.

I'll go with either what I judge based the available definition and what people post or personal self description/confession.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
Nope, I just choose to argue a particular point. Fully aware of the intricacies of these things, but when faced with simplistic leftiebollox arguments, sometimes it's better to fight fore with fire.

I'll go with either what I judge based the available definition and what people post or personal self description/confession.

So no real idea of what a socialist is other than someone to the left of you.
 
Top Bottom