Pross
Well-Known Member
Nick Fuentes thinks he is white, for most of MAGA he isn't, the clue is in the surname. He makes a lot of noise, but he is irrelevant.
Ha - snap!
Nick Fuentes thinks he is white, for most of MAGA he isn't, the clue is in the surname. He makes a lot of noise, but he is irrelevant.
Nick Fuentes thinks he is white, for most of MAGA he isn't, the clue is in the surname. He makes a lot of noise, but he is irrelevant.
I admire your optimism, but reality since 2016 has proven that there's a very large part of the US population that will ignore facts no matter what.
Just another example of the dictator and his projectionism.I do not know why people are so determined to contradict.
The MAGA base is currently doing flips and twists over Trumps comments about there not being enough talent in the US and the H1-B visas:
View attachment 11039
View attachment 11040
View attachment 11041
Just another example of the dictator and his projectionism.
Re: Epstein E-Mails
I have no specific knowledge and just thoughts NOT fact
One of the challenges through the ongoing revelations seems to be the reliability of the accounts from alleged perpetrators and "friends". Can we form any valid view given how many have a track record for blatant lies, unsupported conjecture and downright fantasy.
eg many reports seem to be assuming that the Epstein e-mails represent "truth" but it also sounds like after his conviction maybe he was desperately trying to bolster his own ego. Clearly some did not abandon him but I do wonder about taking anything and everything in Epstein's e-mails as "fact" just as defence from those involved will likely be any twaddle to deflect attention away from themselves.
Those perpetrators have a track record of lies, deception, mistruth, etc. to pursue their own interests.
Re: Epstein E-Mails
I have no specific knowledge and just thoughts NOT fact
One of the challenges through the ongoing revelations seems to be the reliability of the accounts from alleged perpetrators and "friends". Can we form any valid view given how many have a track record for blatant lies, unsupported conjecture and downright fantasy.
....
I agree. Not suggesting we ignore the e-mails but recognise that they are all spinning their lies to further their best interests and extracting truth from defensive lies is difficult and personally I find my views of the individuals make it too easy to take some revelations at face value.Although the dates are critical and don't corroborate Trumps BS.