Donald I, emperor of the world.
- Thread starter C R
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
AuroraSaab
Pharaoh
All you're doing there is advertising both your ignorance of the issues and that you have no interest in women's rights. Slow clap for you.
I've never used the word tranny btw but perhaps you're hoping to bring it back into wider usage.
Fake Trump posts and obsession with White House decor also has zero to do with anything. Every so often there's a detour into sensible discussion about what might be a way forward with Iran or another Trump related issue but mostly it's just random venting and sh#tposting of stuff from elsewhere.
I've never used the word tranny btw but perhaps you're hoping to bring it back into wider usage.
Fake Trump posts and obsession with White House decor also has zero to do with anything. Every so often there's a detour into sensible discussion about what might be a way forward with Iran or another Trump related issue but mostly it's just random venting and sh#tposting of stuff from elsewhere.
AuroraSaab
Pharaoh
Of course you did. You're a man with an opinion on everything, except women's rights obviously.
I think I'll keep reading the Trump thread though.
How else will I know about JD Vance's shoes or that flipping ballroom?
First Aspect
Legendary Member
There are some topics that some people deem inappropriate for satire.
Pinno718
Legendary Member
Are you actually okay hun?
This is the Trump thread.
You are presuming that we have no interest or cannot express an opinion on women's rights.
Despite it being pointed out on numerous occasions, Trump is hardly a supporter of women's rights and therefore, his demise should be of interest to you*.
What about the rights of the victims of Epstein and Trump and the billionaire paedophile cabal?
It's not as if we haven't discussed this at length.
*Let's dig a little bit deeper. There have been hundreds of cases of sexual assault allegations and charges and there has been a few arrests of these 'Christian' pastors. All intertwined with Christian Nationalism - Hegseth is one. In fact, the whole Christian Nationalist cult, movement, call it what you will, is very misogynistic to the point many think women should a) not have the vote and b) should not have a career but be a dutiful housewife. The Trump administration is riddled with Christian Nationalists and here you are saying that we have the wrong set of priorities.
You're accusing us of being uninterested whilst the glaring fact is that within this administration (and within the bible belt of the US), is a movement which wants to erode women's rights, yet this is irrelevant to you and you choose not to point out the threat to women's rights deep in the heart of America presided by an administration who are covering up cases of rape and abuse, potentially on a scale that's difficult to comprehend. How bizarre.
AuroraSaab
Pharaoh
That was probably my mistake, FA. Thinking this was a serious thread about politics.
Thread mentions of WH ballroom = 51
There hasn't been much discussion of Epstein victims. There's been a lot of calling Trump and Andrew Windsor rapists. Again the issue is mostly of interest as a stick to beat Trump/Windsor with. If you knew anything about Epstein you'd know it wasn't just billionaires who visited his island.
It's not irrelevant to me. I think the increasing influence of religion (and partisan voting) in politics generally is alarming, both in the US and here. Again though, there's been little serious discussion of that in this thread and what there has been is mostly just ranting.
(What sex are those Christians arrested in these 'hundreds of cases'? You're so close to getting the issues of the gender thread, but then.....you don't)
What's likely in the US imo is that the economy will be Trump's undoing and, like Starmer, the Democrats will get in on the basis of not being Trump. If they continue to offer what they're offering now they'll get one term and then it will be 5 years of JD Vance. So you can spend the next few years venting about peripheral stuff or have a serious discussion on what a way forward might be.
Edit: To be honest I should have heeded Rusty's warning. He called the thread a Doomsday internet debate. In post 4.
Classic patronising response to women. Tut tut. I'm surprised you haven't suggested I try smiling a bit more.
Thread mentions of Roe vs Wade = 7
Thread mentions of WH ballroom = 51
My point has been that the Democrats aren't offering women much either but you guys are not interested in a wider discussion of any US issues, only in ranting about Trump.
There hasn't been much discussion of Epstein victims. There's been a lot of calling Trump and Andrew Windsor rapists. Again the issue is mostly of interest as a stick to beat Trump/Windsor with. If you knew anything about Epstein you'd know it wasn't just billionaires who visited his island.
It's not irrelevant to me. I think the increasing influence of religion (and partisan voting) in politics generally is alarming, both in the US and here. Again though, there's been little serious discussion of that in this thread and what there has been is mostly just ranting.
(What sex are those Christians arrested in these 'hundreds of cases'? You're so close to getting the issues of the gender thread, but then.....you don't)
What's likely in the US imo is that the economy will be Trump's undoing and, like Starmer, the Democrats will get in on the basis of not being Trump. If they continue to offer what they're offering now they'll get one term and then it will be 5 years of JD Vance. So you can spend the next few years venting about peripheral stuff or have a serious discussion on what a way forward might be.
Edit: To be honest I should have heeded Rusty's warning. He called the thread a Doomsday internet debate. In post 4.
Last edited:
Ian H
Shaman
War as lethal farce. Where's Jaroslav Hasek when you need him?
Pinno718
Legendary Member
I say 'are you okay hun' to men too (and my cat).
The rest, word salad dribble.
...and this thread is about anything Trump, serious or not.
Pblakeney
Legendary Member
I've been saying for years that he wears nappies. Those look to be XXXL though.
I'm familiar with the way clothes lie as my Dad is in a similar position. My Dad is 92 though.
First Aspect
Legendary Member
Possibly a colostomy bag.
Pinno718
Legendary Member
Someone said 'bullet proof nappy'.
icowden
Pharaoh
No, it's a serious thread about DOnald Trump.
Cheer up love.
Because it's about Trump. You want to talk about Roe vs Wade: https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/american-bombshell-roe-vs-wade.238/
Because it's about Trump who keeps banging on about his ballroom
Because this thread is titled "Donald Trump, Emperor of the World"
We do. There is a thread for that. This isn't it.
Well the title of the farking thread seems to be!
I agree with you. There is a thread for that. This is the "Donald Trump, Emperor of the World" thread so we discuss it in relation to Trump
Yes - why don't you create a thread for that, or use one that already exists
Do you have anything interesting or useful to say about Trump in the "Donald Trump, Emperor of the World" thread?
Personally, I think his repeated endorsements of him portrayed as Christ is going to go down like a balloon full of shite with his supporters. This could lead to him being taken to the loony bin and then Vance will take over. In the meantime let's keep on topic eh?
Last edited:
Psamathe
Legendary Member
But it is the biggliest, most impressively, hi-technologisy colostomy bag the world has ever seen, ever ...
And in Trűmpomathics (a less accurate, more exaggerated version of Bistromathics) 8000% better.
Bistromathics itself is simply a revolutionary new way of understanding the behaviour of numbers. Just as Einstein observed that space was not an absolute but depended on the observer's movement in space, and that time was not an absolute, but depended on the observer's movement in time, so it is now realized that numbers are not absolute, but depend on the observer's movement in restaurants." An important concept of bistromathics is recipriversexcluson: being anything other than itself.
Further explanation of the theory behind Bistromathematics: "The first nonabsolute number is the number of people for whom the table is reserved. This will vary during the course of the first three telephone calls to the restaurant, and then bear no apparent relation to the number of people who actually turn up, or the number of people who subsequently join them after the show/math/party/gig, or to the number of people who leave when they see who else has shown up.
The second nonabsolute number is the given time of arrival, which is now known to be one of those most bizarre mathematical concepts, a recipriversexluson, a number whose existence can only be defined as being anything other than itself. In other words, the given time of arrival is the one moment of time at which it is impossible that any member of the party will arrive. Recipriversexclusons now play a vital part in many branches of math, including statistics and accountancy, and also form the basic equations used to engineer the Somebody Else's Problem field.
The third and most mysterious piece of nonabsoluteness of all lies in the relationship between the number of items on the check, the cost of each item, the number of people at the table and what they are each prepared to pay for. (The number of people who have actually brought any money is only a sub-phenomenon in this field)"
Further explanation of the theory behind Bistromathematics: "The first nonabsolute number is the number of people for whom the table is reserved. This will vary during the course of the first three telephone calls to the restaurant, and then bear no apparent relation to the number of people who actually turn up, or the number of people who subsequently join them after the show/math/party/gig, or to the number of people who leave when they see who else has shown up.
The second nonabsolute number is the given time of arrival, which is now known to be one of those most bizarre mathematical concepts, a recipriversexluson, a number whose existence can only be defined as being anything other than itself. In other words, the given time of arrival is the one moment of time at which it is impossible that any member of the party will arrive. Recipriversexclusons now play a vital part in many branches of math, including statistics and accountancy, and also form the basic equations used to engineer the Somebody Else's Problem field.
The third and most mysterious piece of nonabsoluteness of all lies in the relationship between the number of items on the check, the cost of each item, the number of people at the table and what they are each prepared to pay for. (The number of people who have actually brought any money is only a sub-phenomenon in this field)"
