Pblakeney
Squire
Conspiracy theorists keep it interesting. Otherwise it is just “Old man dies of heart attack.” 😉
In other news, I see Donnie can’t even eulogise about a friend without politically weaponising it. Despicable man (polite version).
Donald I, emperor of the world.
- Thread starter C R
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Conspiracy theorists keep it interesting. Otherwise it is just “Old man dies of heart attack.” 😉
In other news, I see Donnie can’t even eulogise about a friend without politically weaponising it. Despicable man (polite version).
Pinno718
Legendary Member
Odd statement. In terms of deconstructing agencies of accountability and enabling Project 2025, he has done a lot. He has empowered the ultra rich. He is also blurring the lines between the executive, the judicial and the legislative in an extraordinarily detrimental way. The pardoning of felons is both mafioso and sets a dangerous precedent. It legitimises violence on opinion - it's the brownshirts in contemporary KKK outfits. Trump's coercive moves against media is straight out of the wannabe dictators guide to totalitarianism.
As far as policies go, then no, he hasn't done a lot but Trump is not in power because he wants to lead a country, he's in power because he's wants be POTUS*. He was bereft of actual policy in Trump 1.0.
Whilst he is POTUS, he can delegate jobs for the boys and line his pockets - after the first term, he said '...I left cash on the table...'.
The sooner people realise he's not there to run a country or to improve the US in any shape of form, then the sooner they might decide enough is enough.
*He also wants to sit on some files that contain Kompromat. Handy to be POTUS really. He may die before facing consequences or accountability - or be so mentally impaired, he wouldn't know what the f*ck was going on thereby avoiding the same.
Last edited:
briantrumpet
Timewaster
Yebbut he winds up the libs, so that's qualification enough. Everything else is just noise to his supporters.
Pinno718
Legendary Member
[This post has turned into Lindsey Graham obituary]
Statistically, 80% of the time L Graham spoke, it was about foreign policy. "Lindsey Graham never met a war he didn't like".
What is 'victory' Bibi?
What is significant, is that in the absence of McConnell and now the death of LyGr, the senate is now tied.
Mike Huckabee: He loved Israel so much, this is terrible loss for Israel blah sh*t blah. Hang on... When a US senator dies, the lamentation is about his love for Israel?! Think about that for a moment.
In salacious news (stuff is coming out because you cannot be sued for defamation when someone is dead), stories are coming out of DC from high class male prostitutes regarding 'lady bug'.
"I'll be with Israel till my dying day". I just wonder what turned LyGr into one of Trump's biggest supporter - Mossad Kompromat. See above.
Statistically, 80% of the time L Graham spoke, it was about foreign policy. "Lindsey Graham never met a war he didn't like".
What is 'victory' Bibi?
What is significant, is that in the absence of McConnell and now the death of LyGr, the senate is now tied.
Mike Huckabee: He loved Israel so much, this is terrible loss for Israel blah sh*t blah. Hang on... When a US senator dies, the lamentation is about his love for Israel?! Think about that for a moment.
In salacious news (stuff is coming out because you cannot be sued for defamation when someone is dead), stories are coming out of DC from high class male prostitutes regarding 'lady bug'.
"I'll be with Israel till my dying day". I just wonder what turned LyGr into one of Trump's biggest supporter - Mossad Kompromat. See above.
Last edited:
briantrumpet
Timewaster
It never was a 'settlement', however often they claimed it was.
briantrumpet
Timewaster
As I thought. Even better, lawyers might face disciplinary proceedings for bringing the improper case.
All uphill
Slow and steady
Now they want to pressure countries to support a US attempt to dismantle the ICC (International Criminal Court).
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/07/13/politics/rubio-dismantle-international-criminal-court
How will Burnham respond?
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/07/13/politics/rubio-dismantle-international-criminal-court
How will Burnham respond?
UglyWithaSidePart
Active Member
secretsqirrel
spiteful class warrior
It might be worth him considering assigning Starmer to ICC shenanigans.
Beebo
Legendary Member
That seems like the kind of gig he’d like.
Do we know if he is going to resign his seat yet? I can’t see him being a back bencher.
That will make for an interesting by election.
Pross
Guru
I wonder why they are so keen to do that? I mean, it’s not like Trump or leaders he likes are in anyway guilty of stuff that would put them in front of the court is it? Oh…
secretsqirrel
spiteful class warrior
I think they could certainly use his experience and knowledge of international law. Jeremy Hunt*, mentioned that Starmer would be the best person to work on review and reform of the European Court.
He is pretty battle hardened now following his 2 years as PM as well.
*I guess his days are numbered in Badenoch’s party as she wants purge out anybody who is pro ECHR.
Pblakeney
Squire
Yup! Trying to future proof themselves.
UglyWithaSidePart
Active Member
That would be an excellent appointment.
