Psamathe
Veteran
My understanding (and anybody correct me if wrong) is thatEU trade deals are a European Commission power and no country can veto.So if you will forgive the ignorance, where does member state l ratification come in?
Ian
My understanding (and anybody correct me if wrong) is thatEU trade deals are a European Commission power and no country can veto.So if you will forgive the ignorance, where does member state l ratification come in?
My understanding (and anybody correct me if wrong) is thatEU trade deals are a European Commission power and no country can veto.
Ian
Jesus that's awful, no wonder we left.Correct - The European Commission has the power to decide and sign trade deals so member countries cannot veto the US deal.
Jesus that's awful, no wonder we left.
Correct - The European Commission has the power to decide and sign trade deals so member countries cannot veto the US deal.
Why so?Jesus that's awful, no wonder we left.
Why so?
jup ifit doesn't swing your favour it's always the messenger right?Or it could be because he's ended up with more colouration on his nose.
it's called copium. Whatever those detailed negotiations entail, i suspect they try the stretch it to the next US (a death Trump means Vance who is 10 times worse) administration, which is considering Eu's gigantic speed of things not really an challenge.I would be surprised if the (in)famous negotiating process the EU goes through would allow a long-termly terrible deal, unless the 'terrible deal' is what they want Trump to think it is, but that'll turn out OK in the end (or just be unravelled once he's gone).
I suspect that all of these 'trade deals' will end up being the starting point of endless detailed negotiations to hammer out details, as Mr Penguin suggests, and before anyone really signs anything 'definitive' Trump will be dead or so away with the fairies he'll be signing his name with the contents of his diapers.
Isn't that strange how many generations ago is Thatcher? Morever the organisation called ''more in common'' the makers of this graphs disguised as a research or in the business off ''shaping opinions.'' it's really an reliable source now is it?Well, I suppose it makes a change from blaming Harold Wilson or Obama, if you're a Tory (or Reform, if there's any difference).
Tony Blair it is then.
And actually interesting that Thatcher is well down the list, even for 2024 Labour voters.
Isn't that strange how many generations ago is Thatcher? Morever the organisation called ''more in common'' the makers of this graphs disguised as a research or in the business off ''shaping opinions.'' it's really an reliable source now is it?