Gender again. Sorry!

[monkers]

I did say long while I would take piss out of you trans supporters

Writing your dribbling nonsense is in no sense piss-taking. Nothing much you say contains truth. You are useless at constructing a cogent argument. All that's left is a never ending sense that you are a moron, a bigot and a hypocrite.

 

[icowden]

Why continue to spout the same contra-factual sh*t?

Which part is contra-factual and why?

 

[icowden]

Blah, blah, blah.
After reading the fallacy of the first sentence, I'll not bother reading the rest of it.

And this is why this discussion makes no progress. I can only conclude therefore that you agree with me, or don't disagree strongly enough to want to express an opinion on the topic.

 

[monkers]

And this is why this discussion makes no progress. I can only conclude therefore that you agree with me, or don't disagree strongly enough to want to express an opinion on the topic.

I'm disappointed, because Iain you've sunken to the depths of Aurora. In the first sentence you presented a fallacy of my views and what I have said. That is not a contribution to a discussion - it's a determination to sink to any depths for the win - utterly pointless waste of time.

I therefore assume the rest is the usual gish-gallop. It doesn't matter how many times a lie is repeated it never becomes the truth, just that the gullible start to believe it. In this place people have started believing their own lies.

 

[Deleted member 159]

With a vote of 20 to nil

The NAIA Just Banned Trans Woman Athletes from women's sport​

NCAA will follow soon enough, especially with Riley Gaines leading litigant in similar case

 

[Deleted member 159]

It doesn't matter how many times a lie is repeated it never becomes the truth

This is so spot on.

Men can never be women

 

[monkers]

This is so spot on.

Men can never be women

They can and they do. Your problem is that you don't like the fact that they do. Women can also become men.

This is because the law effectively says that the terms 'men' and 'women' pertain to identity, not biology. Non-morons understand.

 

[Ian H]

I did say long while I would take piss out of you trans supporters

When are you going to start? Because you've merely been predictably tedious so far.

 

[matticus]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6lNR8jl2ds&t=291s

 

[icowden]

I'm disappointed, because Iain you've sunken to the depths of Aurora. In the first sentence you presented a fallacy of my views and what I have said. That is not a contribution to a discussion - it's a determination to sink to any depths for the win - utterly pointless waste of time.

No, my first sentence was a genuine question - which remains unanswered.

I therefore assume...

They do say that to assume is to make an ass out of u and me.

 

[icowden]

They can and they do. Your problem is that you don't like the fact that they do. Women can also become men.
This is because the law effectively says that the terms 'men' and 'women' pertain to identity, not biology. Non-morons understand.

Conversely, you obtusely refuse to recognise that when @AuroraSaab and @CXRAndy make this statement they are not talking about a legal semantic distinction but a scientific biological distinction. I remind you that the Government is legislating to state that Rwanda is a safe place for refugees by law regardless of whether it actually is or not. Laws do not have to reflect reality. I think we are back to 1984 and the Ministry for Truth...

 

[monkers]

No, my first sentence was a genuine question - which remains unanswered.

They do say that to assume is to make an ass out of u and me.

Oh FFS ... give it a rest eh?

 

[monkers]

Conversely, you obtusely refuse to recognise that when @AuroraSaab and @CXRAndy make this statement they are not talking about a legal semantic distinction but a scientific biological distinction. I remind you that the Government is legislating to state that Rwanda is a safe place for refugees by law regardless of whether it actually is or not. Laws do not have to reflect reality. I think we are back to 1984 and the Ministry for Truth...

To you is a sense of winning more important that establishing truth?

The Lords have rejected the Rwanda Bill because it is a farce because it attempts to overturn the ruling of British courts in that it is not compliant with international law.

The 2004 GRA passed through both houses after the UK was found to be non-compliant with international law.

It is not a mere 'legal semantic distinction', it is the fundamental principle of the act.

See the difference?

 

[Deleted member 159]

They can and they do. Your problem is that you don't like the fact that they do. Women can also become men.

The law is an ass

 

[icowden]

To you is a sense of winning more important that establishing truth?

No. The truth is that a biological male cannot become a biological female and vice versa. It cannot be done. It's impossible at present and would involve completely recoding the DNA of every cell in the body.

On the other hand it is perfectly possible to pass a law that says all apples are oranges. That's just paper.

You know what the distinction is, and to what Andy and Aurora refer.
To you is a sense of winning more important than establishing truth?