icowden
Squire
No - that was my Uncle and Auntie. Tom and Marian.Were the new owners' names Tom and Maria?
No - that was my Uncle and Auntie. Tom and Marian.Were the new owners' names Tom and Maria?
Because those areas also have schools, hospitals, local police, shop workers etc. Or are you saying we should all move to Norfolk (at which point house prices in Norfolk will become extremely high). I'm not living in millionaire's row (that's about 15 minutes drive away... !)Why do you want special treatment for living in an affluent area?
Because those areas also have schools, hospitals, local police, shop workers etc. Or are you saying we should all move to Norfolk (at which point house prices in Norfolk will become extremely high). I'm not living in millionaire's row (that's about 15 minutes drive away... !)
I don't see what's greedy about wanting to stay in the house you grew up in when your parents pass.Honestly, I don't understand. You're usually able to explain your point of view even if I don't always agree with you but all I can see here is entitlement and greed. That can't be all it is, can it?
I don't see what's greedy about wanting to stay in the house you grew up in when your parents pass.
It's very hard to get a mortgage when you are still at school or university. And to flip it over, why is it fair that someone living in Norfolk gets to keep their large 5 bedroom detached house, but someone in Surrey must be forced to sell their 3 bedroom semi?I keep stating the figures because they keep being ignored: your heirs get to keep the first half million plus sixty percent of everything beyond that and you’re vexed that they might have to sell or take out a relatively small mortgage if they do actually want to keep the house.
Do you want tax policy to be based on the purported desires - not needs - of a handful of young orphans?It's very hard to get a mortgage when you are still at school or university.
Do you think the way to fix house price disparity is to bake it even deeper into the tax system?And to flip it over, why is it fair that someone living in Norfolk gets to keep their large 5 bedroom detached house, but someone in Surrey must be forced to sell their 3 bedroom semi?
That doesn't seem fair to me.
Unless it was 99% it would still make the point that it was a tax on the estates of the ultra rich for most of the time it has been around, whereas now it can easily be a tax on the estate of someone in Hackney who bought their council flat. (Which is not an argument for doing away with it, just an observation that it wasn't intended for those people).
No. I think we should just do away with inheritance tax and find a better way to raise taxes.Do you think the way to fix house price disparity is to bake it even deeper into the tax system?
I can see IC's point. My friend bought her fairly modest house 40 plus years ago, never had much money, lives only on her State pension, no savings due to divorce. Due to ridiculous house prices her house was worth £600k. She's sold up and moved to a cheaper area to free up some cash. She would never think of trusts or tax avoidance schemes. Inheritance tax was never meant to catch out people like her, but unfortunately it does - it might not seem completely fair but I can't see a way of making it any better that doesn't disproportionately advantage the much better off.
No. I think we should just do away with inheritance tax and find a better way to raise taxes.
How did it catch her out?
never had much money,
her house was worth £600k
I disagree. I think it needs to be balanced based on the area of the country. £500k would catch almost all of the houses in my local area. In my little close, almost every 3 bed semi with a small garden is worth more than £500k. These are not mansions. These are 1986 new builds.