Israel / Palestine

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Rusty Nails

Country Member
Which retards? The type who did the shooting or the type who did the heroic disarming? And how do you tell the difference?

Best to get rid of them all as that bloke says, I suppose.

Don’t usually watch any of the crap shown by MAGAndy but I did this one.
Moral: Never listen to any racist retard, especially one wearing a national team shirt standing in front of the national flag while ranting about not being a racist, but…
Moral2: Never watch the shyte that MAGAndy reposts.
 
Last edited:

spen666

Über Member
Which retards? The type who did the shooting or the type who did the heroic disarming? And how do you tell the difference?

Best to get rid of them all as that bloke says, I suppose.

...
That way would ensure you get rid of all the first type...the payoff being the loss of all the second type from the territory as well!

A bad trade off some may say
A good trade off some may say.

I can see both sides of the argument, without necessarily agreeing with either
 

Pross

Senior Member
It's odd seeing commentators condemning antisemitism having observed the same commentators explaining away the allegations against Farage
Those in the Spectator ecosystem especially brassnecked.

It seemed to confuse Farage yesterday when all the other Leaders were condemning it and he had to follow suit (albeit with a few extras the others didn't feel the need to include).
 

spen666

Über Member
Plus ça change.

You seem to have problem with people being able to see both sides of an argument?

Perhaps if more people tried to see both sides of a disagreement, then the world would be a better place.

The more understanding their is, the better the world would be.
 

bobzmyunkle

Veteran
You seem to have problem with people being able to see both sides of an argument?

Perhaps if more people tried to see both sides of a disagreement, then the world would be a better place.

The more understanding their is, the better the world would be.

It's one thing seeing both (at least) sides of the argument. It's another entirely when someone's modus operandi is to persistently and piously sit on the fence.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
It's one thing seeing both (at least) sides of the argument. It's another entirely when someone's modus operandi is to persistently and piously sit on the fence.

I have no issue with fence-sitters but I never completely believe people who consistently tell everyone that they are open-minded and always try to see both sides. Nothing wrong with prejudice or bias as long as that is not the only approach adopted.
 
Top Bottom