Normal Island

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Psamathe

Über Member
I am struggling to understand this discussion, who or where was the "talent"?
Seems BBC are deciding whether or not to broadcast the latest series, finished and Wallace too prominent to edit out. Seems (being reported) it's up to Director General to decide https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-...series-of-masterchef-fronted-by-gregg-wallace

To me there is no decision. They F'd up (either BBC themselves or production company or inadequate monitoring or whatever) so they should be apologising profusely and telling us licence fee payers how much money they've wasted and how much has gone to Wallace.

Ian
 

Beebo

Guru
It’s the same with ITV and Gino D’Campo.

They employ a cheeky Italian who makes a living out of sexual innuendo and get surprised when he turns out to be a bit hands on.
 
I am struggling to understand this discussion, who or where was the "talent"?

Never watched Masterchef but enjoyed that Eat Well for Less show. He was the most annoying thing about it though. I think tv companies often over estimate how much affection audiences have for presenters. There are a few who people really like but most of them aren't as indispensable as producers might think. There are very few shows where another presenter couldn't do the job just as well.

It’s the same with ITV and Gino D’Campo.
They employ a cheeky Italian who makes a living out of sexual innuendo and get surprised when he turns out to be a bit hands on.

Never liked him much either, especially since learning he burgled Paul Young's house. The cheeky, lovable rogue thing quickly becomes tiresome.
 

Psamathe

Über Member
TV presenters are the epitome of replaceable.
A bit off topic but in my opinion an extreme example is the financial package BBC newsreaders get. Lots of people capable of looking smart, looking serious and reading autocues.

If BBC news want to pay ludicrous salaries then those reporters and crews in war zones telling us what is really happening would seem more deserving.

Ian
 

Pross

Active Member
I struggle to think of many people who are actually indispensable. Let's face it, even kings are replaced.
TV presenters are the epitome of replaceable.

Strangely I find radio presenters harder to replace. I switched stations to carry on listening to Ken Bruce and Radio 2’s lineup fell apart when they had a knee jerk reaction to criticism over equality.

TV has been a mixed bag. Usually in turns out to be the “talent” that loses out in the end when they change stations albeit with a short-term financial boost. Des Lynham leaving MOTD, Jonathan Ross, Christine whatever her name is that was the original One Show presenter. On the other side of the coin Susannah Reid seems to have done well on ITV and the Top Gear lot did well out of their manufactured sacking especially as Top Gear itself was in its death throes.
 
I think I mentioned this in passing when Wallace first got mentioned in the thread, but here's the actual article. He has a non verbal autistic child to whom he gives 90 minutes on a Saturday afternoon. The rest of the day he mostly spends exercising, breakfasting in Harvester with his pa, and playing computer games.

gregg-wallace-v0-5h2l9d61bl4e1.jpeg
 

icowden

Shaman
Same here. Ken Bruce, Steve Wright were both shows I would happily have on in the background but I couldn't get along with their replacements.
I concur, although I did get used to Chris Evans after Wogan's departure. Couldn't bear Zoe Ball. On the flip side I couldn't stand Steve Wright - I'd much rather have had someone like Craig Charles.

What I miss most is the diversity of music. I used to love listening to Desmond Carrington and Paul Jones, Sounds of the Seventies, the Folk Music show they used to do etc.

I haven't listened to Radio 2 in years now.
 
Top Bottom