Obviously there's a lot to this ...
but can I first ask if anyone knows how typical/atypical the sentences are?
Google failing me, as I guess teenage boys rarely do things this horrendous![]()
The seemingly lenient sentencing seems to be not unusual.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/may/29/teenage-boys-rape-sentencing-youth-courts
Apparently it is all to do with rehabilitation and turning them into worthy citizens.
Fair enough, but I wonder, do the victims get anywhere near the same level of assistance? Gut instinct says no.
The seemingly lenient sentencing seems to be not unusual.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/may/29/teenage-boys-rape-sentencing-youth-courts
Another aspect that concerns me (without knowing solutions) is that one victim who I believe talked to reporters when this initial case became headline news was saying how she is now scared to leave her house, scared to go to school in case she bumps into those who attacked her. That her attackers are still wandering around her locality is in effect imposing a punishment on the victim. And that would often still apply were they to serve a prison sentence and then after they are released.It’s down to what the sentencing guidance says unfortunately. I suspect that might come under review now this case has highlighted the issue. Of course there should be an aim to rehabilitate but there also needs to be a suitable level of the punishment aspect to create a deterrent too.
I've been reading but not posting as whilst this concerns me it's way beyond my understanding of crime, punishment, effectiveness of prison, etc.
Another aspect that concerns me (without knowing solutions) is that one victim who I believe talked to reporters when this initial case became headline news was saying how she is now scared to leave her house, scared to go to school in case she bumps into those who attacked her. That her attackers are still wandering around her locality is in effect imposing a punishment on the victim. And that would often still apply were they to serve a prison sentence and then after they are released.
Apparently it is all to do with rehabilitation and turning them into worthy citizens.
Fair enough, but I wonder, do the victims get anywhere near the same level of assistance? Gut instinct says no.
Why the comparison? We rehabilitate offenders for the good of society - how we do this is determined by what works, and whether the costs are worthwhile. None of that is affected by how much support the victims get.
(and if you're convinced harsher sentences should apply, where are you getting the resources for this? We don't have the prison spaces to just increase sentences for every crime we think it's appropriate for, and the overall budget has limits too).
Equally the victims are supported according to their needs, whilst being restrained by total budgets for that stuff. We don't put more resources into victim support until it matches the resources put into offender rehab. What if you spent less on rehab and more on punishment - would that be a factor in determining the support given to victims?
I think "gut instinct" is a big part of the motivation for many posts here ...
Simple. The perpetrators get support to improve their lives while the victims are left to get on with it, and just cope.
This is wrong, especially so when you hear of victims who do not cope.
Srsly? You think teenage rape victims don't get any support?