What is a woman?

  • Thread starter "slow horse" aka "another sam"
  • Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

monkers

Squire
Its irrational to think you are replying to me?

when you quote my post and then make references to what I have said, most rational people wouldn't think you are replying to me.


You really can't help contradicting yourself can you?

1. If my posts are as you say pointless, why do you keep replying to them.
This behaviour by you in replying contradicts your claims my posts are pointless or could it be your behaviour is irrational?

2. If you are not replying to me, then why quote my posts in your response. The forum tells me you have replied to my post.

You then also respond to the comments I have made in the post you have quoted.

This seems to undermine your claim you are not responding to me.



Actions and words can combine to paint a picture

You can have your last word. I'm bringing an end to this here you tedious and foolish little man.
 
Thing is, Spen, even the mildest of suggestion that this is the law, like it or not, will bring forth abuse. Some people are still in Stage 1-2 of grief over the Supreme Court, ie denial and anger. You're just on the receiving end of it because it's shooting the messenger. Some people imagine you can control the narrative if you silence others.
 

classic33

Myself
Thing is, Spen, even the mildest of suggestion that this is the law, like it or not, will bring forth abuse. Some people are still in Stage 1-2 of grief over the Supreme Court, ie denial and anger. You're just on the receiving end of it because it's shooting the messenger. Some people imagine you can control the narrative if you silence others.
Thing is, this is exactly what you've been saying all along. Even saying the laws of other countries were wrong.
Simply because you didn't agree with those laws.
 
I've often said laws of foreign countries are wrong. It's wrong that Ireland put men in women's prisons. I think child marriage laws are wrong in Iraq. I think some of our UK laws are wrong - when the assisted dying bill passes we'll have another 'wrong' law. I haven't suggested that they aren't the law though, only that the law is wrong and should be changed.

Are you seriously saying nobody should say they think some laws are wrong? How do you think laws get made or changed in the first place?
 

classic33

Myself
I've often said laws of foreign countries are wrong. It's wrong that Ireland put men in women's prisons. I think child marriage laws are wrong in Iraq. I think some of our UK laws are wrong - when the assisted dying bill passes we'll have another 'wrong' law. I haven't suggested that they aren't the law though, only that the law is wrong and should be changed.

Are you seriously saying nobody should say they think some laws are wrong? How do you think laws get made or changed in the first place?
In law though, they are women, not men.
 
And my opinion is that the law that says they are women in law is wrong. Further, sex is biological and no law can make you the other sex because a law does not change material reality. You could pass a law that said the earth was flat. It would not be flat because you passed a law that said it was.
 

classic33

Myself
And my opinion is that the law that says they are women in law is wrong. Further, sex is biological and no law can make you the other sex because a law does not change material reality. You could pass a law that said the earth was flat. It would not be flat because you passed a law that said it was.
Remains the law though whether you like it or not. You just have to get used to the law.
 

monkers

Squire
Please stop it. Seriously. Both going on ignore.

How many is that now? I followed Brian's lead in putting people on ignore. Now I'm releasing them because lies always need challenging.
 

Ian H

Legendary Member
How many is that now? I followed Brian's lead in putting people on ignore. Now I'm releasing them because lies always need challenging.

Slow down! You know the joke about "Someone's wrong on the internet" (pic of person angrily jabbing at their keyboard in the small hours).
 
Whatever we think of the decision it's the law for now. We need to ensure that, particularly for those fully transitioned, we sort the law so they can live their lives normally. The idea of Heather having to pee in the mens or the bloke who does training in my profession going to the ladies is simultaneously cruel and absurd.

If it goes to the ECHR it'll undoubtedly be used by the Tories as a factor in why we should pull out.

It also creates the nightmare where the trans lobby win at the ECHR and then spend a decade while government is dragged kicking and screaming to compliance.

See the history of the GRA.
 
Any compromise that women have suggested in the past, like unisex 3rd spaces (toilets and changing rooms) or specialist transgender provision (prisons, rape crisis), or Open categories in sport, has been dismissed again and again.

Once again though, I can only point out that you see transwoman Heather having to use the Gents as cruel and absurd to Heather, but don't see it as cruel and absurd to the women who have to share with Heather.

“‘phallic drift’: ‘the powerful tendency for public discussion of gender issues to drift, inexorably, back to the male point of view’”
— Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed D. Bell and R. Klein.
 

monkers

Squire
Any compromise that women have suggested in the past, like unisex 3rd spaces (toilets and changing rooms) or specialist transgender provision (prisons, rape crisis), or Open categories in sport, has been dismissed again and again.

Once again though, I can only point out that you see transwoman Heather having to use the Gents as cruel and absurd to Heather, but don't see it as cruel and absurd to the women who have to share with Heather.


— Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed D. Bell and R. Klein.

Article 8 is engaged. Aurora's law is not.
 

icowden

Squire
Whatever we think of the decision it's the law for now. We need to ensure that, particularly for those fully transitioned, we sort the law so they can live their lives normally. The idea of Heather having to pee in the mens or the bloke who does training in my profession going to the ladies is simultaneously cruel and absurd.
And unworkable to achieve. @monkers has pointed this out. You can't usually tell what gender someone is just by looking at them. Sometimes you can be 99% sure. But it is possible that the lady who is 6 foot 2, who looks fabulous but has masculine looking features, is actually a woman, just as it is possible that they are a transwoman. So unless you are going to carry out DNA checks at the door, toilets will continue to be self policing. She also pointed out that the current arguments have not helped butch lesbians at all.

What the SC ruling has helped clarify is that it is not unreasonable to protect things like Women's sport and women's refuges. Although the chances of there being issues in the latter are very small. Same actually goes for prisons where the incarceration is based on the best way to keep a prisoner incarcerated and also safe rather than arbitrary gender decisions.

Where we differ is that I think some of the blame sits with Stonewall and their decision to champion trans at the expense of lesbian and gay. They are having to back down now.

The other point of difference is whether you believe trans to be something inherent like being gay, or whether you believe it to be a characteristic of a mental disorder. Again, @monkers and I have very different points of view on this topic.

What is useful however, is to talk and discuss. @monkers experience is based on the very real experience she has had with her niece. Everyone else, myself included, is not arguing from the position of actually knowing someone who has experienced the issue of wanting to change gender.
 
Top Bottom