X

[AndyRM]

The government don’t actually want to ban X.
They want X to stop generating child porn and other unwanted images. It shouldn’t be hard for X to do this. And it isn’t a free speech issue.

RIght on all counts, but now that it's been warped into a freeze peach issue Musk won't have to do anything.

 

[TailWindHome]

It's not a free speech issue for Musk

 

[C R]

It's not a free speech issue for Musk

No, it is a freeze peach issue.

 

[icowden]

See my answer above. Apart from about 3 of us, the criticism of Starmer on here is that he's too right wing. I mean it's a point of view I suppose although not necessarily one that is widely held outside this bubb!e, sorry forum.

No, the criticism is usually that he's pretty dull, comes across as useless and doesn't seem to understand Labour core values. He jumps at every shadow instead of creating his own policies and sticking to them. He needs cohones.

 

[icowden]

He is still making huge profits, so its ill behoves you or I to call his ability

Is he? Not from X I don't think.

update - I checked, X lost $577 million in 2025 from a 13.7% decline in revenue year on year.
Tesla's profits dropped markedly due to tariffs and lost the title of biggest EV maker.

The company making money for him is spacex because that money comes from the US Govt and he has no working rivals in the field.

 

[Shortfall]

Do you take people at face value when they tell you they want to reduce immigration to protect vulnerable children?

Because anyone who's suspicious of government overreach must be a racist? JFC this place! Are you still in the sixth form of something? Grow up!!

 

[Shortfall]

The government don’t actually want to ban X.
They want X to stop generating child porn and other unwanted images. It shouldn’t be hard for X to do this. And it isn’t a free speech issue.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do

 

[Xipe Totec]

Any other website which had a database of child sexual abuse images which it allowed users to access, create & distribute composited versions of (which is what generative AI does) would be required to remove that material or deny access to it in accordance with UK law, otherwise it would be made inaccessible.

I'm not entirely sure why anyone thinks X should be exempted fom that. Just because it's owned by a ket-addled, reactionary little Billion Dollar ManBaby who just happens to be richer than God?

 

[Mad Doug Biker]

I know it isn't Musk, but...:

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1HxyyuVomU/?mibextid=wwXIfr

 

[Blazing Saddles]

The Tories intend to follow Australia’s lead in banning under 16s from social media.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2wyeqw3gpo

 

[TailWindHome]

Because anyone who's suspicious of government overreach must be a racist? JFC this place! Are you still in the sixth form of something? Grow up!!

What an odd reaction.
No one called you a racist

 

[TailWindHome]

The government don’t actually want to ban X.
They want X to stop generating child porn and other unwanted images. It shouldn’t be hard for X to do this. And it isn’t a free speech issue.

X can't do this
Once they do they accept they are responsible for the content their AI is making

They should be crimnally liable, at a corporate level, for the images they produce.

 

[CXRAndy]

Seems leftist governments ramping up rhetoric improves popularity


View: https://x.com/i/status/2010192764164813163

 

[Beebo]

X can't do this
Once they do they accept they are responsible for the content their AI is making

They should be crimnally liable, at a corporate level, for the images they produce.

This is where legislation needs to catch up quickly.
Someone must be responsible for what AI does.

 

[CXRAndy]

This is where legislation needs to catch up quickly.
Someone must be responsible for what AI does.

Piss off the Ai, this is what will come for you