farfromtheland
Regular AND Goofy
A problem just for AI, or for humans as well?
There is no substitute for human intelligence. AI be damned.
A problem just for AI, or for humans as well?
There is no substitute for human intelligence. AI be damned.
There is no substitute for human intelligence. AI be damned.
What do we matter? Not a lot on a universal scale, but the wonder of consciousness is a precious notion nevertheless, and our planet is/was so beautiful!We are all fat heads. Our brains are just fat, water and some other random stuff. Human intelligence is nothing when we are the designers and constructors of all the stuff (including the internet and AI) that is soon to destroy us. Look at how much we collectively care.
Tech sector lying about developments they want to make. Government just repeating those lies. Are we surprised?UK datacentres will create just 25% of jobs predicted by tech sector, analysis finds
Datacentres in the UK will create just a quarter of the jobs predicted by the tech sector, while consuming vast amounts of energy, according to new research.
Environmental thinktank Verdant predicts that all the datacentres currently planned are likely to directly employ 10,400 workers – compared with the more than 40,000 cited in projections by the industry lobby group TechUK.
Labour has defended the rapid rollout of AI datacentres in the face of growing public scepticism, amid concerns about their demand for water and energy. The government has also echoed TechUK’s claims about job creation.
What do we matter? Not a lot on a universal scale, but the wonder of consciousness is a precious notion nevertheless, and our planet is/was so beautiful!
I am not a religious person, but appreciate that the associated myths resonate with meaning, sometimes prophetic, or at least insightful beyond limited material rationales.
We, and our parents and dear ones, shape and grow our own minds, or not, as we choose. The tree of knowledge analogy kind of reflects this. Having apparently developed as a species in conscious choice and ethical responsibility I am appalled by 'human' effort (or its lack) to stupify future generations.
I insist on caring as an individual and fighting for my child and grandchild to have a chance of life and freedom and mindful love. If no-one else cares to participate in this project I'm still up for it!
What else can I do?
Tech sector lying about developments they want to make. Government just repeating those lies. Are we surprised?
On the radio the other day CEO of ARM Holdings was talking about AI and claiming how it will find the cure to cancer. Bit of an "old story", promising "the cure to cancer" (again). Also lack of understanding what he's talking about as there are loads of different cancers from many causes requiring different "cures" so dearming of a single "cure" is just naive.No.
In other news, Anthropic are warning of a greater than 10% chance of AI wiping out the human race within 10 years. Great this, isn’t it?
Although as AI is something we have developed, something we control and a tool we have made, a bit like we are destroying ourselves. Just like if we dropped a nuclear bomb on ourselves - would be blame the bomb or blame the person who pushed "the button".No.
In other news, Anthropic are warning of a greater than 10% chance of AI wiping out the human race within 10 years. Great this, isn’t it?
Although as AI is something we have developed, something we control and a tool we have made, a bit like we are destroying ourselves. Just like if we dropped a nuclear bomb on ourselves - would be blame the bomb or blame the person who pushed "the button".
But then if AI doesn't wipe us out, we'll manage the same self-destruction with Climate Change (and all despite knowing exactly how to avoid it and despite having everything necessary to avoid it). Almost a definition of stupidity. We are a flawed species.
I agree but also there is an assumption that we can control Climate Change. Or that we can control our economy, etc. All things we have created that we assume we can control but maybe reality is we can't or we won't address it until we can't. eg for Climate Change scientists have identified "tipping points" after which positive feedback will have "taken the genie out of the bottle".There is an assumption there that we control AI.
Even Anthropic think that is no longer the case. Once the genie is out of the bottle…
I agree but also there is an assumption that we can control Climate Change. Or that we can control our economy, etc. All things we have created that we assume we can control but maybe reality is we can't or we won't address it until we can't. eg for Climate Change scientists have identified "tipping points" after which positive feedback will have "taken the genie out of the bottle".
Doesn't include me either.I can confirm that by “we” you don’t include me.
My longstanding position is that people who think they have control of their lives are delusional.
This includes climate change and the global economy from individuals right up to governments. A concerted effort would be required and that seems beyond humans.