glasgowcyclist
Über Member
Why, if it is legal to arrive in that way?
Hey, I didn’t make the law. That’s just the way it is.
Why, if it is legal to arrive in that way?
Why, if it is legal to arrive in that way?
If Ryanair let you board a flight from, say, Paris Beauvais to Leeds without you having the right passport/stamps and you're detected on arrival they have to return you and pay a fine.
As airline check in staff are not experts on the minutiae of visas etc and there's a blame culture towards staff who let the 'badduns' board you'll see stories in the papers with monotonous regularity of people with every right to return to their UK being denied boarding.
Hey, I didn’t make the law. That’s just the way it is.
Well @glasgowcyclist has nailed pretty much the biggest one to be honest. Everyone on a legal vessel has to be on the manifest.
Then there's stuff like public reaction etc.
A sitting prime minister couldn't have wished for a more auspicious start to his term.
Never to be forgotten for sure
Couldn’t you be on the manifest, without documents?, eg name, gender.
Anyway, let’s forget this rabbit hole, it mystifies me, but, I will sleep tonight.
Section 40 of the Nationality and Borders Act, according to Google, plus I guess the Illegal Migration Act. Until your asylum claim is decided you are here without permission.
Who's to say all the BS residents are vulnerable, trafficked people? I would expect there is some discretion used over placements.
Now he's not joking, Andy's right. If it's not fit for young men who've crossed the channel on a boat, it's not fit for young men who've been charged but not convicted.
Legal pin head dancing. It's illegal to transport undocumented people into the country, but not illegal for a person to arrive without documents.Why, if it is legal to arrive in that way?
Legal pin head dancing. It's illegal to transport undocumented people into the country, but not illegal for a person to arrive without documents.
Edited to add: It was presumably easier and cheaper to prosecute (mostly) innocent drivers than to operate robust border controls.
Does this mean the rule/law was only brought in relatively recently (say, last 20 years), and that prior to that airlines/ferries COULD transport persons without documents (other than tickets).
The requirement to check documentation was applied to airlines during the Thatcher era.
Less certain about ferries.
Does this mean the rule/law was only brought in relatively recently (say, last 20 years), and that prior to that airlines/ferries COULD transport persons without documents (other than tickets).
You have to present a valid ticket and passport to leave and enter the UK via ferry. I've done it many times when motorcycling in Europe