BRFR Cake Stop 'breaking news' miscellany

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

PurplePenguin

Active Member
I made my post without actually looking up what their pensions are. Proper glass house stuff. A 5 year term gets them €5k per month indexed linked and tax free.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
Does this include fixing the overly generous pensions offered to the commissioners themselves?

It's weird how politicians seem to escape the privations everyone else has to put up with (US, UK, EU, and probably everywhere else). In the US, all Congressmen/women are still getting paid despite the rest of government having been laid off, and whose healthcare comes free.... Truss still gets her lifetime PM's pension for having been PM for just a trusse, and Farage is still getting his EU pension.
 

Stevo 666

Veteran
It's weird how politicians seem to escape the privations everyone else has to put up with (US, UK, EU, and probably everywhere else). In the US, all Congressmen/women are still getting paid despite the rest of government having been laid off, and whose healthcare comes free.... Truss still gets her lifetime PM's pension for having been PM for just a trusse, and Farage is still getting his EU pension.

Its an issue across a lot of the public sector that needs fixing. Which is a good way of making material future savings to state expenditure.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
Welcome news:

https://bsky.app/profile/lizziedearden.bsky.social/post/3m3f7as2bvc2s

1760706167654.png


Whatever one's sympathies, as it's been formulated and applied, the prohibition is making a mockery of the legal apparatus, and so undermines faith in it, when hundreds of people are being arrested peacefully protesting while holding up pieces of cardboard.

Judicial review ought to bring some sense to the question, rather that the police over-zealously enacting a poorly-considered prohibition.
 

Psamathe

Veteran
Welcome news:

https://bsky.app/profile/lizziedearden.bsky.social/post/3m3f7as2bvc2s

View attachment 10567

Whatever one's sympathies, as it's been formulated and applied, the prohibition is making a mockery of the legal apparatus, and so undermines faith in it, when hundreds of people are being arrested peacefully protesting while holding up pieces of cardboard.

Judicial review ought to bring some sense to the question, rather that the police over-zealously enacting a poorly-considered prohibition.
I wonder how much of the hearings will be in open court and how much the Government will try and push into secret hearings with public and most others excluded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
Careful now!

I voiced no opinion about Palestine or Israel, just about the legal implications of having a dubious proscription poorly policed. It makes an ass of the law, and that's on no-one's interest.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Legendary Member
I wonder how much of the hearings will be in open court and how much the Government will try and push into secret hearings with public and most others excluded.

Given the context of the granting of judicial review, I'd be surprised if any Government requests for hiding stuff away from scrutiny by the public aren't treated very sceptically by the judiciary.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: C R

PurplePenguin

Active Member
I voiced no opinion about Palestine or Israel, just about the legal implications of having a dubious proscription poorly policed. It makes an ass of the law, and that's on no-one's interest.

Most of the terrorism legislation is bad and needs reviewing. E.g. on entering the country terrorism officers can demand access to all online passwords and phones, it is a criminal offence to refuse and there is no right to a lawyer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Shortfall

Regular
Most of the terrorism legislation is bad and needs reviewing. E.g. on entering the country terrorism officers can demand access to all online passwords and phones, it is a criminal offence to refuse and there is no right to a lawyer.

George Galloway and his wife were recently arrested and interrogated under this legislation after landing back in the UK. Refusing "suspects" the right to silence and other basic human rights that supposedly make us free is absolutely despicable and the sort of treatment you'd only expect in a despotic, third world slum. As far as I remember he refused to handover his passwords and it will be interesting to see what, if anything happens to him.
 

CXRAndy

Squire
If you're a citizen of said country, those terrorism laws should not apply to right to silence and giving access to digital equipment.

Different matter if you're entering another country. You should be aware and prepared.
 

First Aspect

Über Member
Most of the terrorism legislation is bad and needs reviewing. E.g. on entering the country terrorism officers can demand access to all online passwords and phones, it is a criminal offence to refuse and there is no right to a lawyer.

That was basically down to untalented Tories using legislation as a campaigning tool.

Look how tough we are.
 

Shortfall

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: C R
Top Bottom