BRFR Cake Stop 'breaking news' miscellany

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

midlandsgrimpeur

Well-Known Member
That strikes me as an admission that we are a racist country requiring clarification instead of a country with some racists who are best ignored.

I think it points more to the malevolent actions of a fairly small but vociferous far right contingent who effectively utilise social media to rapidly spread their racist shite. It is a sad indictment of their influence though that many police forces have adopted a policy of highlighting ethnicity in particularly sensitive cases in an attempt to cut them off at the knees, so to speak.
 

secretsqirrel

Senior Member
That strikes me as an admission that we are a racist country requiring clarification instead of a country with some racists who are best ignored.

According to Badenoch’s response to Jess Philips last week, we need to go after the gangs of immigrants from countries with a culture that does not respect women and girls.

Her response missed the point of the Philips statement but I’m not expecting a retraction any time soon.
 

secretsqirrel

Senior Member
I think it points more to the malevolent actions of a fairly small but vociferous far right contingent who effectively utilise social media to rapidly spread their racist shite. It is a sad indictment of their influence though that many police forces have adopted a policy of highlighting ethnicity in particularly sensitive cases in an attempt to cut them off at the knees, so to speak.

Unfortunately these internet trolls will join the dots if the picture is not drawn for them, quickly.
 
I think it points more to the malevolent actions of a fairly small but vociferous far right contingent who effectively utilise social media to rapidly spread their racist shite. It is a sad indictment of their influence though that many police forces have adopted a policy of highlighting ethnicity in particularly sensitive cases in an attempt to cut them off at the knees, so to speak.

They could have said that all the accused are British nationals.
Anyone querying past that is outing themselves as racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

AuroraSaab

Pharaoh
In what way is ethnic origin relevant to a rape enquiry?

Characteristics of both victims and offenders, including ethnicity, are often relevant to offending patterns. As MG says the police now report it so people don't jump to conclusions, especially in charges with large numbers of defendants.

As the offences are historic, I wonder if this is a case of a woman finding the confidence to go to the police after seeing the Pelicot case, or perhaps the police reviewing a complaint that had earlier been dismissed. It could be more straightforward in that an arrest for other offences brought these crimes to light.
Brave of her to waive her anonymity.
 
No, no, they're racists who have been told that they've got legitimate concerns.
FTFY
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Pharaoh
Stop everything. I predict you'll forever remember the moment you read this.

1000019788.jpg
 
  • Laugh
Reactions: C R

Psamathe

Guru
Re: Proscribed organisations
Are the Police failing to tell the difference between a noun and an adjective?
3336.jpg

To my mind in her sign the "Palestine Action" is an adjective describing the prisoners she's supporting ie she's supporting prisoners not a proscribed organisation.

But then English never was one of my abilities and Grammar definitely not.
 

Pross

Über Member
Re: Proscribed organisations
Are the Police failing to tell the difference between a noun and an adjective?
View attachment 11776
To my mind in her sign the "Palestine Action" is an adjective describing the prisoners she's supporting ie she's supporting prisoners not a proscribed organisation.

But then English never was one of my abilities and Grammar definitely not.

Or is she saying she supports Palestine Action whereas prisoners oppose genocide. A comma would help with the confusion 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Pharaoh
Re: Proscribed organisations
Are the Police failing to tell the difference between a noun and an adjective?
View attachment 11776
To my mind in her sign the "Palestine Action" is an adjective describing the prisoners she's supporting ie she's supporting prisoners not a proscribed organisation.

But then English never was one of my abilities and Grammar definitely not.

They've decided that they are the grammar police, so any statement in which the two words 'Palestine' and 'Action' appear, even if they are in two separate sentences, override any niceties of punctuation or part-of-speech-ness. It's ludicrous. I assume protesters could avoid being arrested by simply omitting the word 'action', unless the police then decide that simply 'Palestine' implies 'Palestine Action'.

Asmentioned before, it's a linguistic question that really ought to be followed into the even further regions of ridiculousness, with linguistics professors telling the judiciary that this law is a total ass as it's being prosecuted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
Top Bottom