bobzmyunkle
Über Member
How bad did I say I expected it to be?
Bad, really bad.
How bad did I say I expected it to be?
Bad, really bad.
How bad did I say I expected it to be?
Zombie apocalypse whereas now you merely think it's an apocalypse (and the average person thinks it is occasionally inconvenient).
Once major beneficiaries of EU funding and home to thousands of European students, UK universities are now facing significant financial strain in the wake of Brexit. Brexit's impact on Universities has led to funding gaps, a sharp decline in EU student enrollments, and increased barriers to international mobility. With the loss of Erasmus+ and rising tuition fees for European students, institutions are struggling to attract talent and maintain global partnerships. While the introduction of the Turing Scheme has provided alternative opportunities for study abroad, concerns remain over long-term financial sustainability and accessibility within UK higher education.
I don't remember using those exact words, but if you say I did, the proof either way has evaporated into the ether.
Whatever, at least I got the general direction of travel right, unlike Brexiters and their unicorns.
I may have embellished the words a little to make the point which is that you have not really reflected on your own position and have simply sought to prove that you were right. This is just the mirror of those you pour scorn on.
Welsh police forces reported road collisions that caused 3,993 casualties in 2024 - these were the lowest figures recorded apart from 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The collisions on 20mph and 30mph roads resulted in 1,751 casualties, also the lowest figure ever recorded and down 20% from the previous year.
Is that a function of their average age?
It's not easy to admit one's own blunders, especially when the things that people had warned would/might happen then actually happened. Very few of the problems were entirely unforeseen.
So, it could be a self inflicted (financial) injury?
Now research commissioned by TfL on the safety benefits of 20mph has given the green light for more speed cuts – especially as no evidence was found that 20mph limits increased congestion.
It found there were 35 per cent fewer collisions and 36 per cent fewer casualties on borough roads where 20mph zones had been introduced.
In particular, children were even less likely to be hurt – with a 50 per cent reduction in casualties and 75 per cent reduction in fatalities.
An architect BR forumite not of this new parish posted a graph, yes a graph, with a turning point of deaths/serious injuries at about 30 mph. It was really quite persuasive and tipped me personally from on the fence to being unable in good conscience to object.The good news about 20mph limits just keeps on coming... these aren't marginal improvements.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/tra...ries-collisions-tfl-will-norman-b1228903.html
An architect BR forumite not of this new parish posted a graph, yes a graph, with a turning point of deaths/serious injuries at about 30 mph. It was really quite persuasive and tipped me personally from on the fence to being unable in good conscience to object.
At this point, opposition to 20 zones in residential and high pedestrian areas is up there with resistance to seatbelt use on the grounds that they prevent people from being safely thrown away from the vehicle.