Pinno718
Senior Member
You've only got to look at the US model to see where that ends up: the worst average outcomes for the highest average cost.
This ^.
You've only got to look at the US model to see where that ends up: the worst average outcomes for the highest average cost.
I know we've been over this before, but these companies are very canny at identifying sectors that have a captive customer base then aggressively turning them into quasi monopolies through acquisition of all meaningful competition (see the veterinary industry, for instance). Once they've done that (or been handed that, as in the case of water companies), then, in Trump's words, they hold all the cards.
The only question is what industry will they target next. We know they are gunning for the NHS, as it's the same principle: something absolutely essential and unavoidable. You've only got to look at the US model to see where that ends up: the worst average outcomes for the highest average cost.
Presumably, I'm supposed to be outraged at a company making a profit of 22.6%?
That's capitalism that is.
I'm trying and failing to find figures for private school fees over the same time, but I suspect that they haven't doubled.
I'm going to cherry pick here, because I assume that's how headlines work.
March 2020 - min wage for a 21 year old was £7.70. April 2025 it was £12.21. That's only a 59% increase, but a lot of companies now need to pay more than the min wage. Also, employers' NI is higher by around £500 per person.
March 2020 - interest rate 0.1%. April 2025 - 4.5%.
Impressive cherry picking. I was hoping you'd be able to find the figures I couldn't find, as that'd be a valid comparison, sans cerises.
I'd suggest that a profit margin of 22% suggests a very uncompetitive market, and unlike with any surplus that private schools make, is not going to be reinvested in the schools: it's going to be paid in dividends and keeping the share price high for investors.
I know we've been over this before, but these companies are very canny at identifying sectors that have a captive customer base then aggressively turning them into quasi monopolies through acquisition of all meaningful competition (see the veterinary industry, for instance). Once they've done that (or been handed that, as in the case of water companies), then, in Trump's words, they hold all the cards.
The only question is what industry will they target next. We know they are gunning for the NHS, as it's the same principle: something absolutely essential and unavoidable. You've only got to look at the US model to see where that ends up: the worst average outcomes for the highest average cost.
It's one aspect of its current state, sure. My suspicion is that the tools for extracting the maximum possible profit aggressively on a global scale have developed somewhat and become much more commonly used over the last few decades, but as I know nothing about global capitalism, that might be a terrible terrible libel about lovely cuddly capitalism, that's there only for the good of mankind.
Also, I asked Copilot about private school fee increases. You can pick a school and it will tell you. I tried a few London ones which are up around 50% over five years, but Exeter's finest is only up 23% which is pretty remarkable given the impact of VAT.
It's one aspect of its current state, sure. My suspicion is that the tools for extracting the maximum possible profit aggressively on a global scale have developed somewhat and become much more commonly used over the last few decades, but as I know nothing about global capitalism, that might be a terrible terrible libel about lovely cuddly capitalism, that's there only for the good of mankind.