briantrumpet
Legendary Member
One of the conclusions of the inquiry was that children were not given enough consideration and that lockdowns had an enormous impact on them. I think, on balance, I would prefer the PM to do everything possible to avoid closing schools.
One of things I think the inquiry should have found is that the right, with hindsight, response to covid may not be the best response to the next pandemic. Some of the initial failings came about, because all the UK's advice up to that point made out lock downs were pointless. The obvious danger is that the government becomes too gung-ho about the imposition of lock downs and tries to take that approach when it is not necessary.
Sure. Still lots to learn, but delaying decisions was unforgivable (and was recognised time after time), as it shuts off less draconian actions.
I'm not sure if the science about children spreading covid is yet settled. It is worth remembering that there was essentially panic in March 2020 as no-one really knew what was happening, and the news from Italy was very grim indeed, and there was no vaccine at that point. Schools didn't do a great job for the first one, as none were really prepared. Emailing out homework once a day wasn't adequate. My one-to-one online lessons were hugely appreciated, as the children got to converse with a real person outside of their household in real time.
As a side note, when I see legacy signs about washing hands to stop the spread of covid, it reminds me of my bemusement why that lingered on as being more important than good ventilation.
Did Sturgeon ever get round to cutting off the bottoms of Scottish schools' classroom doors?