Budget 2025

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

secretsqirrel

Well-Known Member
The only thing you are missing is politicking.

What…… politicians politicking? :surrender:
 
In my view politicking is the main reason this country is in the state it is. Has been for a considerable period of time but it's getting worse.
There is too much time spent on point scoring and not enough on governing. The opposition are an integral part of that governance.

I said it frequently over on CS, but the post-Truss govt spent all its time trolling Labour rather than actually doing anything meaningful: their few 'policies' seemed to be predicated on 'winding up the libs', not solving any problems whatsoever (see the cynical NI cut from Hunt).
 

secretsqirrel

Well-Known Member
It’s pretty rubbish politicking and doesn’t seem to make any sense.

They have them from Temu..

shttps:/
27735d08f8c040909921ecfa07d178cf-goods.jpeg


#sorrybored
 
The FT's Stephen Bush suggesting they are just aiming at the wrong target, if they want to criticise Reeves. Maybe the baying crowd of journos want that quick fix of "She's lying!" rather than the less catchy "We think her forecasts are wrong, but we'll only know for sure in 2029".

1764589190283.png
 

Psamathe

Guru
I don’t understand the manufactured indignation about where there was or wasnt a small surplus. Various chancellors have either talked up or talked down a situation for their own benefit.

The chancellor can raise taxes for any reason.
I am enjoying Badenoch's indignation about Reeves misleading people about how much better the economy is going than expected.
The inner turmoil. 😂
Chancellor increases headroom shock!

I’m worrying that I’m missing something, I thought a bit of resilience was a good thing in these times of threat.
To me it's not about whether or not there should be more "headroom" or we should be taxing more to spend more on welfare - those are political choices.

What is so bad about the issue of "misleading" is that when the Chancellor presents a situation and expects people to believe that situation she should be telling the truth.

Political decisions about taxation & expenditure are completely separate to presenting true data about the real state of the economy.
 
To me it's not about whether or not there should be more "headroom" or we should be taxing more to spend more on welfare - those are political choices.

What is so bad about the issue of "misleading" is that when the Chancellor presents a situation and expects people to believe that situation she should be telling the truth.

Political decisions about taxation & expenditure are completely separate to presenting true data about the real state of the economy.

Well, I blame all the people doing the speculation pre budget, while speculation was spooking the markets. As said prior, people should wait to see what's in the budget before criticising it. Reeves was responding to criticism. If she'd said nothing then things would have escalated.

Anyone thinking there wouldn't be tax rises was deluded. Anyone thinking there won't be further tax rises is deluded.

Also, no politician of any colour wants to come clean on the real state of the economy. The electorate cannot handle the truth. (Respect to Jack)
 

CXRAndy

Shaman
LCR chickened out on a grilling from MPs.

Over
60% believed she lied
58% dislike her as Chancellor only 16% approve of her (mostly on NCAP)

48% thinks is a bad budget

Cabinet confirms, they were not informed of the fiscal situation by either LCR or TTK, it being far more positive than lead to believe.-they were misled and are angry about it
 
Last edited:

Psamathe

Guru
Well, I blame all the people doing the speculation pre budget,
Reeves was one of the main sources of that speculation. eg
Anyone thinking there wouldn't be tax rises was deluded.
If a Chancellor makes statement indicating the state of the economy people, markets, etc. will react and adjust their behaviour according to those statements so they need to be able to believe they are true. "It's politics" is no excuse for making known untrue statements to the public/markets.
 
Reeves was one of the main sources of that speculation. eg


If a Chancellor makes statement indicating the state of the economy people, markets, etc. will react and adjust their behaviour according to those statements so they need to be able to believe they are true. "It's politics" is no excuse for making known untrue statements to the public/markets.

The markets seem to have given a collective shrug to the whole thing.
 
Top Bottom