D
Deleted member 28
Guest
“and immediately it sprang up, because it had no depth of earth.”
Thought as much, full of sh*t.
“and immediately it sprang up, because it had no depth of earth.”
Thought as much, full of sh*t.
As if Lady Whatsername has ever been on the Clapham Omnibus.
I have explained my words; I am sorry that you still don’t understand them.
Humour doesn’t hit the spot for everyone every time and it rarely survives dissection. Neither of us should lose sleep over it.
That someone was me, in detail, in post #557.someone would have had great pleasure explaining what you mean
That someone was me, in detail, in post #557.
What the f**k does this even mean?Your apparent view of the desirability of language being immutable is reminiscent of the Académie Française,
To assume is to make an ass out of both you and me.I assume you either attempted some kind half arsed intellectual reference to something I once said or you've completely cocked up and mixed me up with someone else.
Some fell on stony places, where they had not much earth: and immediately they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth:
Shall I try with smaller words?What the f**k does this even mean?
35 pages of white people discussing what they think black people should be called, ending up with 4 pages of 'but women shouldn't have an exclusive word for themselves'.
If I littered every post with explanatory links you wouldn’t click them anyway, would you? What’s the point?What the f**k does this even mean?
I don't think I will ever get my head round how feminists of all people are willing, by recognising so-called transwomen as women, to throw actual women under the bus. To enable men to be in control - think sports.
Excellent article in today's Times by
Tomiwa Owolade
He gives an interesting Black British perspective on the issue.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/our-obsession-with-race-is-pushing-us-apart-xrcfkmn8h