Critics argued that hosting COP29 in Azerbaijan was inappropriate due to the country's poor human rights record and allegations of ethnic cleansing against the former population of Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh.[8][9][10] They highlighted that Azerbaijan is a major fossil fuel producer, with an authoritarian government extensively linked to corruption,[11][12] and the choice to host COP29 “greenwashes” its reputation.[13][14][15][16] Additionally, concerns were raised about the government's crackdown on journalists and environmental activists before the conference, indicating a suppression of free speech and civil society.[17][18][19][20] Human rights advocates are calling for the release of political prisoners and urging the international community to address these issues before the summit takes place.[21][22][23] Michael Rubin, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, wrote that COP29 risks legitimizing Azerbaijani President Aliyev's authoritarian regime, much like the 1936 Berlin Olympics did for Hitler.[24] Reporters and anti-corruption non-profits have also criticized that the conference is held in an authoritarian state with extensive corruption.[25][26] The "official partners" of COP29 are businesses that are owned by ruler Ilham Aliyev's family or have ties to the Aliyev family's businesses.[25][26]