Climate Crisis: Are we doing enough?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

matticus

Guru
they had a certification/accreditation process for most logical fallacies and gave them foreign names.

That sounds a hideous combination - I'm sure all good CycleChatters would agree!
 

briantrumpet

Über Member
Perhaps it didn't meed the threshold of "logical" in the ancient world?

Maybe my use of 'logical' is incorrect, but you can be pretty sure that people have been trying to win arguments with every trick in the book since verbal communication evolved into words & language as we think of it. We're a devious lot, us humans.
 

First Aspect

Senior Member
Maybe my use of 'logical' is incorrect, but you can be pretty sure that people have been trying to win arguments with every trick in the book since verbal communication evolved into words & language as we think of it. We're a devious lot, us humans.

Or deviant, for those of us with jerk mates.
 
Maybe my use of 'logical' is incorrect, but you can be pretty sure that people have been trying to win arguments with every trick in the book since verbal communication evolved into words & language as we think of it. We're a devious lot, us humans.

In the late 17th century, John Locke first used the phrase argumentum ad verecundiam. This has come to mean Argument from Authority. The Greeks and Romans didn't name that one either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

This thread seems to embrace views from all level of experts.
 

First Aspect

Senior Member
In the late 17th century, John Locke first used the phrase argumentum ad verecundiam. This has come to mean Argument from Authority. The Greeks and Romans didn't name that one either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

This thread seems to embrace views from all level of experts.
Er... Track 10, Jagged Little Pill?
 

matticus

Guru
If you say so, but, I was thinking in more practical terms, ie actually doing something

You don't think debate is important? Or do you want to drive to an agreed spot to discuss it? An internet forum seems low impact compared to old-fashoined international summits.

[and at the risk of broken-record-syndrome ... are you in favour of people actually doing something?]
 

First Aspect

Senior Member
You don't think debate is important? Or do you want to drive to an agreed spot to discuss it? An internet forum seems low impact compared to old-fashoined international summits.

[and at the risk of broken-record-syndrome ... are you in favour of people actually doing something?]

Depends. Doing things like blocking roads, vandalising paintings, interrupting sporting events and otherwise annoying the people you are trying to persuade is counter productive.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
You don't think debate is important? Or do you want to drive to an agreed spot to discuss it? An internet forum seems low impact compared to old-fashoined international summits.

[and at the risk of broken-record-syndrome ... are you in favour of people actually doing something?]

If they are minimising their own hypocrisy, yes. One simple way in which everyone could minimise the impact of the human race, on the planet, is to practice effective birth control.
 

Pblakeney

Well-Known Member
Look, anyone on the internet in the last few years has been through all this before. The chances are that you're both d1ckheads, but let's cut to the chase to be sure:
- Do you believe our fossil fuel usage is driving climate change?
- Do you think there is any value in protest groups trying to make the world better less worse?

I made it perfectly clear in my initial post that oil is used for more than fuel. Strawman.
Protests are only of any use if you have a solution/alternative.
 
Top Bottom