Daily Mail 1 Prince Harry & Others 0

[spen666]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c932dy1p94wt


all sides lose on costs

 

[BoldonLad]

Shouldn't this go in the "Good News" Thread? 😂

 

[spen666]

Shouldn't this go in the "Good News" Thread? 😂

controversial

 

[Electric_Andy]

I don't know the case, obviously. But it looks from the initial report that perhaps feelings were used instead of facts. A judge doesn't care how much it has upset you, when you're claiming financial reimbursement

 

[spen666]

I don't know the case, obviously. But it looks from the initial report that perhaps feelings were used instead of facts. A judge doesn't care how much it has upset you, when you're claiming financial reimbursement

Reading the summary of the judgement ( actual judgement is 400 pages long) it seems you've summed it up well. The claimants whilst thet think the paper had used unlawful means were unable to prove that and paper was able to give credible explanations of how they got the material lawfully.

The biggest winners here are the lawyers ( unless they were doing it as no win no fee cases)